Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6851 - 6860 of 34405 for WA 0812 2782 5310 [[Pandawa KacaFilm]] Proyek Kaca Film UV Protection Eromoko Wonogiri.

[PDF] James M. McCabe v. Midwest Evergreens, Inc.
. The shifting of the burden, with nothing more, protects the seller and his agent from negligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9480 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jamal R. Jackson
of the offense, the character of the offender and the need for the protection of the public.” Id. at 571
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12771 - 2017-09-21

State v. Annette L. Memmer
. The purposes of probation are rehabilitation of offenders and protection of the community interest. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3013 - 2005-03-31

Waukesha County v. Devlin D.D.
supervision over the juvenile shall have the right and duty to protect, train, discipline, treat and confine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13634 - 2005-03-31

State v. Brian W. Cantwell
the clarification actually increased the original sentence, and thus violated Cantwell’s double jeopardy protections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3313 - 2005-03-31

State v. Timothy A. Knight
instead focused on the need for deterrence, punishment and public protection. Because the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15411 - 2005-03-31

Allen L.W. v. Ann Marie W.
in this state substantial evidence concerning the child's present or future care, protection, training
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9775 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and the need to protect the public, the court indicated that it was required to “look at the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93402 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Steven W. Schmidt
sentence are the gravity of the offense, the character of the offender, and the need for protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9074 - 2017-09-19

State v. Jamal R. Jackson
and the need for the protection of the public.” Id. at 571, 544 N.W.2d at 576. The court here complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12771 - 2005-03-31