Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 68531 - 68540 of 75347 for judgment for us.
Search results 68531 - 68540 of 75347 for judgment for us.
State v. Eduardo Perez
sentence was imposed. As used in this subsection, “actual days spent in custody” includes, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9778 - 2005-03-31
sentence was imposed. As used in this subsection, “actual days spent in custody” includes, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9778 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
2019AP000378 US Bank NA v. Tamara D. Tellock 11-17-2020 Affirmed 2019AP000632 CR State v. Andre L
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=322987 - 2021-01-08
2019AP000378 US Bank NA v. Tamara D. Tellock 11-17-2020 Affirmed 2019AP000632 CR State v. Andre L
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=322987 - 2021-01-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide with use of a dangerous weapon. He appealed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857223 - 2024-10-03
was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide with use of a dangerous weapon. He appealed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857223 - 2024-10-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
concluding there is no basis to challenge Scalzo’s conviction for injury by intoxicated use of a motor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214778 - 2018-06-26
concluding there is no basis to challenge Scalzo’s conviction for injury by intoxicated use of a motor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214778 - 2018-06-26
CA Blank Order
and that Wis. Stat. § 974.06 could not be used to relitigate issues that had already been reviewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91386 - 2013-01-06
and that Wis. Stat. § 974.06 could not be used to relitigate issues that had already been reviewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91386 - 2013-01-06
[PDF]
State v. Cesar G.
logically interpreted the facts, applied the proper legal standard and used a demonstrated, rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5536 - 2017-09-19
logically interpreted the facts, applied the proper legal standard and used a demonstrated, rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5536 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
appealed. A warden’s decision not to use his or her discretion under the rule is entirely up to the warden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29162 - 2007-05-23
appealed. A warden’s decision not to use his or her discretion under the rule is entirely up to the warden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29162 - 2007-05-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
counsel did not object to the State’s use of the evidence. The plain error doctrine applies when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26865 - 2006-10-23
counsel did not object to the State’s use of the evidence. The plain error doctrine applies when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26865 - 2006-10-23
William N. Ledford v. William Noland
. See Wis. Stat. § 893.735(2) (1997-98).[1] Ledford appeals. The record before us consists of nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15683 - 2005-03-31
. See Wis. Stat. § 893.735(2) (1997-98).[1] Ledford appeals. The record before us consists of nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15683 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Local 236 Laborers International Union of North America v. City of Madison
not persuaded us that the arbitrator’s evidentiary decision regarding the weight he chose to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3665 - 2017-09-19
not persuaded us that the arbitrator’s evidentiary decision regarding the weight he chose to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3665 - 2017-09-19