Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6861 - 6870 of 12426 for mr.
Search results 6861 - 6870 of 12426 for mr.
State v. Andrew D. Birmingham
there was “enough evidence of impairment based on this record to support the officer’s request to have Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28
there was “enough evidence of impairment based on this record to support the officer’s request to have Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28
[PDF]
State v. Franklin A. Barton
) for Mr. Barton in pleading guilty to the crime was to spare the victim of any further suffering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7740 - 2017-09-19
) for Mr. Barton in pleading guilty to the crime was to spare the victim of any further suffering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7740 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Randolph A. Clark
asked me, ‘Mr. Clark, are you going to refuse the breath test at this time?’” Clark testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5197 - 2017-09-19
asked me, ‘Mr. Clark, are you going to refuse the breath test at this time?’” Clark testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5197 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kris A. Westberg
to go home. It was at this point Howard decided to arrest Westberg: I told Mr. Westberg that based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7525 - 2005-03-31
to go home. It was at this point Howard decided to arrest Westberg: I told Mr. Westberg that based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7525 - 2005-03-31
State v. James D. Krause
for a restitution hearing, Judge James L. Carlson wrote, “Mr. Krause—Your motion will not be heard. Judge Race
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3196 - 2005-03-31
for a restitution hearing, Judge James L. Carlson wrote, “Mr. Krause—Your motion will not be heard. Judge Race
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3196 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
in charging this matter until after Mr. Ingli turned 17 years of age on April 30, 2005.” ¶6 The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27053 - 2006-11-06
in charging this matter until after Mr. Ingli turned 17 years of age on April 30, 2005.” ¶6 The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27053 - 2006-11-06
[PDF]
State v. Curtis L. Golston
could write the letter “because I wasn't sure if the restraining order was still in effect ... and Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10624 - 2017-09-20
could write the letter “because I wasn't sure if the restraining order was still in effect ... and Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10624 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
and discussed those facts with Mr. Stegall? [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Yes. THE COURT: And have you discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2788 - 2017-09-19
and discussed those facts with Mr. Stegall? [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Yes. THE COURT: And have you discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2788 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court stated, “Mr. Gilbert is now paying $550 less each month in child support.” Mark argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66958 - 2011-07-05
. The court stated, “Mr. Gilbert is now paying $550 less each month in child support.” Mark argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66958 - 2011-07-05
[PDF]
City of New London v. James E. Knaus
be admitted into evidence without testimony and that Mr. Neuser, who is with the hygiene lab, can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4809 - 2017-09-20
be admitted into evidence without testimony and that Mr. Neuser, who is with the hygiene lab, can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4809 - 2017-09-20