Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6871 - 6880 of 16449 for commentating.
Search results 6871 - 6880 of 16449 for commentating.
State v. David Guzman
considered the lawyers’ comments and Guzman’s statements. During the hearing, the trial court remarked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15350 - 2005-03-31
considered the lawyers’ comments and Guzman’s statements. During the hearing, the trial court remarked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15350 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
to practice law in Wisconsin be revoked. He commented that he had found no mitigating factors
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56321 - 2010-11-02
to practice law in Wisconsin be revoked. He commented that he had found no mitigating factors
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56321 - 2010-11-02
COURT OF APPEALS
with McNeil, who knew Jackson from prior interactions. During the conversation, Jackson made comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50288 - 2010-05-24
with McNeil, who knew Jackson from prior interactions. During the conversation, Jackson made comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50288 - 2010-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS
competitive work.…” In his narrative report [Dr. Reddy] … also makes a comment on [Chartier’s] ability to work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49312 - 2010-04-27
competitive work.…” In his narrative report [Dr. Reddy] … also makes a comment on [Chartier’s] ability to work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49312 - 2010-04-27
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth L. Bingham
occasions. Finally, the State commented on Bingham’s prior record, his family relationships
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20494 - 2017-09-21
occasions. Finally, the State commented on Bingham’s prior record, his family relationships
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20494 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
.2d 738 (Ct. App. 1984). The record shows that Cetnar was afforded an opportunity to comment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106457 - 2014-01-06
.2d 738 (Ct. App. 1984). The record shows that Cetnar was afforded an opportunity to comment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106457 - 2014-01-06
Patricia O'Neil v. Monroe County Circuit Court
assessing the jury costs. When neither O’Neil or Assistant District Attorney Ekern offered any comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5817 - 2005-03-31
assessing the jury costs. When neither O’Neil or Assistant District Attorney Ekern offered any comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5817 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jimmie Davison
. This comment is evidence that 5 The phrase “or equally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3768 - 2017-09-19
. This comment is evidence that 5 The phrase “or equally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3768 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, that counsel’s performance was prejudicial because the trial court’s comments at sentencing addressed many
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83975 - 2012-06-25
, that counsel’s performance was prejudicial because the trial court’s comments at sentencing addressed many
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83975 - 2012-06-25
CA Blank Order
that decision easier. The comment had nothing to do with the sentence credit issue. [7] The third victim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103136 - 2013-06-17
that decision easier. The comment had nothing to do with the sentence credit issue. [7] The third victim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103136 - 2013-06-17