Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6871 - 6880 of 68485 for did.
Search results 6871 - 6880 of 68485 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
him “why he did what he did,” “why did you put my hand in your pants?” He responded by saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57805 - 2014-09-15
him “why he did what he did,” “why did you put my hand in your pants?” He responded by saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57805 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and heard arguments from the parties. The court determined that the facts alleged by Grogan did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267975 - 2020-07-09
and heard arguments from the parties. The court determined that the facts alleged by Grogan did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267975 - 2020-07-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Gray did not unequivocally invoke his right to remain silent, we affirm. Police arrested Gray
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675759 - 2023-07-05
that Gray did not unequivocally invoke his right to remain silent, we affirm. Police arrested Gray
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675759 - 2023-07-05
State v. James A. Newson
) there was insufficient evidence to find that he was actually in possession of the cocaine. Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7322 - 2005-03-31
) there was insufficient evidence to find that he was actually in possession of the cocaine. Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7322 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gregory M. Davis
to explain the actions he took, and this incident was the type for which he would document what he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11438 - 2005-03-31
to explain the actions he took, and this incident was the type for which he would document what he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11438 - 2005-03-31
State v. John L. Dye, Jr.
and recanted her earlier statements made to the police when she said, “I am very sorry for what I did to John
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5897 - 2006-10-16
and recanted her earlier statements made to the police when she said, “I am very sorry for what I did to John
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5897 - 2006-10-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
police about the accident, Geyer replied No. 2014AP2625-CR 3 “that he did not know he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140332 - 2017-09-21
police about the accident, Geyer replied No. 2014AP2625-CR 3 “that he did not know he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140332 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
of the record indicates that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying McClellan's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8227 - 2017-09-19
of the record indicates that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying McClellan's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8227 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Detective William Sheehan advised her of her Miranda rights, and Simmons again said she did not want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540149 - 2022-07-06
, Detective William Sheehan advised her of her Miranda rights, and Simmons again said she did not want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540149 - 2022-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS
that day. The following day, Montgomery says she was assigned duties that did not require wanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45574 - 2009-03-11
that day. The following day, Montgomery says she was assigned duties that did not require wanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45574 - 2009-03-11