Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6871 - 6880 of 68485 for did.
Search results 6871 - 6880 of 68485 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
him “why he did what he did,” “why did you put my hand in your pants?” He responded by saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57805 - 2014-09-15
him “why he did what he did,” “why did you put my hand in your pants?” He responded by saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57805 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not refuse any test; and (3) the State lost the video of his arrest, which resulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107325 - 2017-09-21
did not refuse any test; and (3) the State lost the video of his arrest, which resulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107325 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Joseph E. Sabol v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
of the Wisconsin Personnel Commission that the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire (UWEC) did not unlawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7211 - 2017-09-20
of the Wisconsin Personnel Commission that the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire (UWEC) did not unlawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7211 - 2017-09-20
State v. David Gallagher
, Gallagher contends that he was not advised of and did not understand the elements of the offense. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4527 - 2005-03-31
, Gallagher contends that he was not advised of and did not understand the elements of the offense. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4527 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
; that he was acquainted with Bergevain and his brothers; and that he suspected they “did a similar thing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87126 - 2012-09-18
; that he was acquainted with Bergevain and his brothers; and that he suspected they “did a similar thing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87126 - 2012-09-18
State v. William Faison
phrase. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12576 - 2005-03-31
phrase. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12576 - 2005-03-31
Walter H. Osswald v. Jack Osswald
and Laverne, essentially expressed their desire and willingness to accept Jack’s offer. Although Jack did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18867 - 2005-07-05
and Laverne, essentially expressed their desire and willingness to accept Jack’s offer. Although Jack did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18867 - 2005-07-05
State v. Brandy Albert Essex
not impose a sentence to run consecutive to a future sentence, the trial court did not do that. Indeed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31
not impose a sentence to run consecutive to a future sentence, the trial court did not do that. Indeed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
program now.” Defense counsel did not correct or clarify any of Holifield’s responses. At the guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27498 - 2006-12-18
program now.” Defense counsel did not correct or clarify any of Holifield’s responses. At the guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27498 - 2006-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
home in the next nine months?” Debra’s trial counsel did not object to the testimony. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99612 - 2014-09-15
home in the next nine months?” Debra’s trial counsel did not object to the testimony. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99612 - 2014-09-15