Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6871 - 6880 of 69594 for had.
Search results 6871 - 6880 of 69594 for had.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the officers had multiple opportunities to read her the Informing the Accused form and to obtain her consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483663 - 2022-02-15
that the officers had multiple opportunities to read her the Informing the Accused form and to obtain her consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483663 - 2022-02-15
Lana C. Wittig v. Brian K. Hoffart
had vacated. Hoffart also claims that there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19357 - 2005-09-19
had vacated. Hoffart also claims that there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19357 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Christopher J. Drexler
- We conclude that under the totality of the circumstances, the arresting officer had sufficient
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8837 - 2017-09-19
- We conclude that under the totality of the circumstances, the arresting officer had sufficient
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8837 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
16, 23 N.W.3d 214, the circuit court concluded the Owens had failed to allege sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119148 - 2026-05-19
16, 23 N.W.3d 214, the circuit court concluded the Owens had failed to allege sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119148 - 2026-05-19
State v. Titus Graham
had erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing; (2) he alleged that his pleas had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24635 - 2006-03-27
had erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing; (2) he alleged that his pleas had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24635 - 2006-03-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
record abstract and argued Risse had been convicted of an implied consent violation in Connecticut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159381 - 2017-09-21
record abstract and argued Risse had been convicted of an implied consent violation in Connecticut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159381 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Grover argues that he was deprived of a fair trial because one of the jurors had a financial interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603164 - 2022-12-20
. Grover argues that he was deprived of a fair trial because one of the jurors had a financial interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603164 - 2022-12-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, and emphasized he had received no reasons for denying his requests. Webster also cited the Wis. Stat. § 19.34(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98478 - 2013-07-01
, and emphasized he had received no reasons for denying his requests. Webster also cited the Wis. Stat. § 19.34(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98478 - 2013-07-01
COURT OF APPEALS
eliciting from Sundermeyer’s mother on cross-examination, that she had earlier obtained a restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36152 - 2011-05-10
eliciting from Sundermeyer’s mother on cross-examination, that she had earlier obtained a restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36152 - 2011-05-10
[PDF]
State v. Niko MaShell Triggs
statements that she had made to the police. After a Miranda-Goodchild 2 hearing, the trial court ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4947 - 2017-09-19
statements that she had made to the police. After a Miranda-Goodchild 2 hearing, the trial court ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4947 - 2017-09-19