Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6871 - 6880 of 63537 for records.

[PDF] State v. Rodney Henderson Reed
mitigating factor of “lack of a prior record” on only one of the score-sheets. Reed also asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8174 - 2017-09-19

Gerald Draves v. Gavin Priegel
). ¶11 The record is clear that Priegel failed to file his brief on the pending injunction issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2882 - 2005-03-31

State v. James A. Sybers
have much choice.” His attorney then stated: DEFENSE COUNSEL: For the record, if I can interrupt, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5668 - 2005-03-31

State v. Terry L. Robertson
the counsel of record or the proposed counsel. The court did, however, address calendaring issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2309 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
addressed Holtz’s criminal record. It described Holtz’s prior Washington county conviction as a “sweet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27613 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
criteria for waiver on the record. When it reached the adequacy of the juvenile court system for Jacob’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830909 - 2024-07-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erred by denying his motion for access to the victim’s counseling records without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751397 - 2024-01-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
no-merit report addressing Knickerbocker’s claims. Having independently reviewed the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491247 - 2022-03-08

Christina L. Riedlinger v. Joseph C. Riedlinger
. Both parties proceed pro se in this appeal. Joseph's brief lacks citation to the record and legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10150 - 2005-03-31

Anthony L. Alsum v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
on severance damages was admissible. ¶2 After reviewing the record, we conclude that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6915 - 2005-03-31