Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 68711 - 68720 of 83486 for case codes/1000.
Search results 68711 - 68720 of 83486 for case codes/1000.
State v. Steven A. Wienke
case is different from Johnson because the trial court expressly referenced the victim's recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10008 - 2005-03-31
case is different from Johnson because the trial court expressly referenced the victim's recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10008 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Sandles
). “The determination of reasonableness is made by reference to the particular circumstances of each individual case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5719 - 2017-09-19
). “The determination of reasonableness is made by reference to the particular circumstances of each individual case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5719 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Duane Lesky v. County of La Crosse
promissory estoppel claim and, in any case, it was not reasonable for Lesky to rely on anything other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14245 - 2014-09-15
promissory estoppel claim and, in any case, it was not reasonable for Lesky to rely on anything other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14245 - 2014-09-15
State v. James L. Wright
. Burns, 226 Wis. 2d 762, 773, 594 N.W.2d 799 (1999). ¶11 In this case, the State concedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5981 - 2005-03-31
. Burns, 226 Wis. 2d 762, 773, 594 N.W.2d 799 (1999). ¶11 In this case, the State concedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5981 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry Lamont Gatewood
and Minnis were ultimately located and charged in connection with the incidents involved in this case. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3392 - 2005-03-31
and Minnis were ultimately located and charged in connection with the incidents involved in this case. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3392 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(“[W]hether an identification procedure is impermissibly suggestive must be decided on a case-by-case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36519 - 2009-05-18
(“[W]hether an identification procedure is impermissibly suggestive must be decided on a case-by-case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36519 - 2009-05-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
shall be at least 25 years.”). Subsequently, the case was transferred to a different judge due
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134041 - 2017-09-21
shall be at least 25 years.”). Subsequently, the case was transferred to a different judge due
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134041 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
[.]” They cite case law stating, “[E]xcept where modified by statute, the law is that all of the subscribing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143756 - 2015-06-29
[.]” They cite case law stating, “[E]xcept where modified by statute, the law is that all of the subscribing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143756 - 2015-06-29
State v. Terry A. Apel
with the State that the facts of that case are distinguishable in a key respect. In Mincey, all people living
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3219 - 2005-03-31
with the State that the facts of that case are distinguishable in a key respect. In Mincey, all people living
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3219 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
, see RULE 809.86(4), we do the same for the homicide victim in this case. All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=949610 - 2025-05-01
, see RULE 809.86(4), we do the same for the homicide victim in this case. All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=949610 - 2025-05-01