Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 68771 - 68780 of 75220 for public records.
Search results 68771 - 68780 of 75220 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at his trial was insufficient to support the verdicts. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087890 - 2026-03-10
at his trial was insufficient to support the verdicts. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087890 - 2026-03-10
State v. Joel N. Nitka
issue in this case. The uniqueness of the issue requires full development of the issue and record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8257 - 2005-03-31
issue in this case. The uniqueness of the issue requires full development of the issue and record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8257 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Diane L. Guse v. Ronald C. Guse
exercises its discretion if it articulates its reasons, bases its decision on facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9216 - 2017-09-19
exercises its discretion if it articulates its reasons, bases its decision on facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9216 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
sentenced on inaccurate information, including erroneous information about his juvenile record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41230 - 2014-09-15
sentenced on inaccurate information, including erroneous information about his juvenile record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41230 - 2014-09-15
Mary L. Schommer v. Michael W. Schommer
authority or facts in the record. See State v. Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d 627, 646, 492 N.W.2d 633 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4628 - 2005-03-31
authority or facts in the record. See State v. Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d 627, 646, 492 N.W.2d 633 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4628 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert J. Probst v. Winnebago County
, 372, 514 N.W.2d 48, 49 (Ct. App. 1994). We independently examine the record to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13639 - 2017-09-21
, 372, 514 N.W.2d 48, 49 (Ct. App. 1994). We independently examine the record to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13639 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
by the victim of McKinney as his assailant. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107431 - 2014-01-26
by the victim of McKinney as his assailant. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107431 - 2014-01-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114229 - 2026-05-05
denying his motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114229 - 2026-05-05
CA Blank Order
an order denying his claims for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112161 - 2014-05-06
an order denying his claims for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112161 - 2014-05-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference No. 2019AP1001 2 that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449587 - 2021-11-09
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference No. 2019AP1001 2 that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449587 - 2021-11-09