Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6881 - 6890 of 68758 for had.
Search results 6881 - 6890 of 68758 for had.
[PDF]
Teresa Thompson v. Todd Thompson
. The State presented evidence of Thompson’s income for the years about which it had information, and made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2961 - 2017-09-19
. The State presented evidence of Thompson’s income for the years about which it had information, and made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2961 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
told him that the vehicle and the person involved in the fight had turned north on Dewey. Mathison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75482 - 2014-09-15
told him that the vehicle and the person involved in the fight had turned north on Dewey. Mathison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75482 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Notably, it found that Pautz and Gleichner had “entered into an oral agreement to jointly purchase
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952585 - 2025-05-07
. Notably, it found that Pautz and Gleichner had “entered into an oral agreement to jointly purchase
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952585 - 2025-05-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in concluding the deputy had reasonable suspicion to request that he perform field sobriety tests. While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611524 - 2023-01-18
in concluding the deputy had reasonable suspicion to request that he perform field sobriety tests. While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611524 - 2023-01-18
Village of Westfield v. Thomas A. Moore
Jeopardy Clause because Moore's operating privilege had been administratively revoked. Moore concedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9941 - 2005-03-31
Jeopardy Clause because Moore's operating privilege had been administratively revoked. Moore concedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9941 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert Machotka v. Village of West Salem
. The Village responded to each request by providing Machotka with all the information it had in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15468 - 2017-09-21
. The Village responded to each request by providing Machotka with all the information it had in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15468 - 2017-09-21
Robert Machotka v. Village of West Salem
. The Village responded to each request by providing Machotka with all the information it had in its possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15468 - 2005-03-31
. The Village responded to each request by providing Machotka with all the information it had in its possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15468 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. For each claim, the Department of Workforce Development (DWD) asked Sprecher if she had performed work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28660 - 2014-09-15
. For each claim, the Department of Workforce Development (DWD) asked Sprecher if she had performed work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28660 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Catherine J. Farrey v. Russell S. Gonnering
with whom they had a “common interest” concerning the statements. Gonnering and the other defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9076 - 2017-09-19
with whom they had a “common interest” concerning the statements. Gonnering and the other defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9076 - 2017-09-19
Catherine J. Farrey v. Russell S. Gonnering
with whom they had a “common interest” concerning the statements. Gonnering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9557 - 2005-03-31
with whom they had a “common interest” concerning the statements. Gonnering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9557 - 2005-03-31