Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6881 - 6890 of 57315 for id.
Search results 6881 - 6890 of 57315 for id.
Dorothy A. Wessel v. Emmett D. Wessel
is based on the facts appearing in the record and the appropriate and applicable law. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11645 - 2005-03-31
is based on the facts appearing in the record and the appropriate and applicable law. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11645 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael A. Seitz
. See id. at 400, 509 N.W.2d at 344. Our review of the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9290 - 2005-03-31
. See id. at 400, 509 N.W.2d at 344. Our review of the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9290 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James E. Cole
to an unrevoked period of probation. See id. at 76. However, this decision was based on a previous version
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14805 - 2017-09-21
to an unrevoked period of probation. See id. at 76. However, this decision was based on a previous version
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14805 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jesse J. Schloemer
upon whether the vehicle was lawfully stopped. Id. We independently review the legality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9138 - 2017-09-19
upon whether the vehicle was lawfully stopped. Id. We independently review the legality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9138 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentencing rationale reasonably justifies its determination as to such programs. See id., ¶9. Koch argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250841 - 2019-11-27
sentencing rationale reasonably justifies its determination as to such programs. See id., ¶9. Koch argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250841 - 2019-11-27
CA Blank Order
of reasonableness.” Id. at 687-88. To demonstrate prejudice, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134027 - 2015-01-27
of reasonableness.” Id. at 687-88. To demonstrate prejudice, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134027 - 2015-01-27
State v. Barry A. Schuh
constitutional guarantees is a question of law we review independently. See id. at 388-89. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2886 - 2005-03-31
constitutional guarantees is a question of law we review independently. See id. at 388-89. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2886 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert A. Schweiner
the evidence by the jury. Id. at 506-07. ¶4 Schweiner argues that the State failed to prove that three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7515 - 2005-03-31
the evidence by the jury. Id. at 506-07. ¶4 Schweiner argues that the State failed to prove that three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7515 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Pierce County v. Amy F.
to a CHIPS order.” Id. Thus, there need not be a six-month window from the last CHIPS order to the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7551 - 2017-09-19
to a CHIPS order.” Id. Thus, there need not be a six-month window from the last CHIPS order to the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7551 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
evidence that a new factor exists. Id., ¶36. Second, the defendant must show that the new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713494 - 2023-10-11
evidence that a new factor exists. Id., ¶36. Second, the defendant must show that the new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713494 - 2023-10-11