Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6891 - 6900 of 9145 for jurors.
Search results 6891 - 6900 of 9145 for jurors.
State v. Maurice Clark
. During her opening statement to the jury, Clark’s counsel told the jurors Clark would not contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12328 - 2005-03-31
. During her opening statement to the jury, Clark’s counsel told the jurors Clark would not contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12328 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
] and should convince the jurors.’” Id. (citation omitted). The prosecutor should aim “to analyze
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98007 - 2014-09-15
] and should convince the jurors.’” Id. (citation omitted). The prosecutor should aim “to analyze
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98007 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no objections for cause, and the single prospective juror who expressed skepticism about the State’s burden
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334581 - 2021-02-11
no objections for cause, and the single prospective juror who expressed skepticism about the State’s burden
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334581 - 2021-02-11
State v. Duane E. Bolstad
held that the State could not force a defendant in a criminal case to trial before only six jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2661 - 2005-03-31
held that the State could not force a defendant in a criminal case to trial before only six jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2661 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Daniels
. Jurors are presumed to follow the court's instructions. State v. Truax, 151 Wis.2d 354, 362, 444 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9988 - 2012-03-05
. Jurors are presumed to follow the court's instructions. State v. Truax, 151 Wis.2d 354, 362, 444 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9988 - 2012-03-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
,” allowing jurors to “speculate as to why” he had been incarcerated and undermining the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1080568 - 2026-02-24
,” allowing jurors to “speculate as to why” he had been incarcerated and undermining the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1080568 - 2026-02-24
COURT OF APPEALS
was not unanimous; (2) the trial court committed plain error when it allowed the jurors to pose questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113298 - 2014-06-02
was not unanimous; (2) the trial court committed plain error when it allowed the jurors to pose questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113298 - 2014-06-02
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s right to proceed pro se with the “convenience of the witnesses, jurors, and the court schedule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115773 - 2014-07-01
the defendant’s right to proceed pro se with the “convenience of the witnesses, jurors, and the court schedule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115773 - 2014-07-01
State v. Emmanuel Pettis
the fact that Pettis had a travel pass. A reasonable juror would be aware that a law abiding citizen would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5738 - 2005-03-31
the fact that Pettis had a travel pass. A reasonable juror would be aware that a law abiding citizen would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5738 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Billye L. Massey
, and not in conjunction with the other charges. This limiting instruction, which the jurors are presumed to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25064 - 2017-09-21
, and not in conjunction with the other charges. This limiting instruction, which the jurors are presumed to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25064 - 2017-09-21