Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6891 - 6900 of 39027 for probate forms.
Search results 6891 - 6900 of 39027 for probate forms.
State v. Corina D.
of cooperation with the rules of probation. We reject her arguments and affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7654 - 2005-03-31
of cooperation with the rules of probation. We reject her arguments and affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7654 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supervision) to be served consecutively to each other and any other sentence, placed Liedke on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467198 - 2021-12-29
supervision) to be served consecutively to each other and any other sentence, placed Liedke on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467198 - 2021-12-29
COURT OF APPEALS
Burns on probation for three years, with six months of confinement as a condition.[2] ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31095 - 2007-12-10
Burns on probation for three years, with six months of confinement as a condition.[2] ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31095 - 2007-12-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
and placed Burns on probation for three years, with six months of confinement as a condition.2 ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31095 - 2014-09-15
and placed Burns on probation for three years, with six months of confinement as a condition.2 ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31095 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2010AP1398-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2008CF32
) and 328.16 (1981),6 that was a reasonable response to a “special need” of the probation system. The Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68708 - 2014-09-15
) and 328.16 (1981),6 that was a reasonable response to a “special need” of the probation system. The Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68708 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael A. Grindemann
Michael Grindemann’s forty-four-year sentence to “time served” and placed him on probation. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3657 - 2005-03-31
Michael Grindemann’s forty-four-year sentence to “time served” and placed him on probation. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3657 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Nuchell
its discretion in sentencing Richard A. Nuchell to twenty days in jail as a condition of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14000 - 2014-09-15
its discretion in sentencing Richard A. Nuchell to twenty days in jail as a condition of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14000 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the revocation of his probation on a conviction for child abuse—recklessly causing harm. Attorney Ellen Krahn
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208691 - 2018-02-19
the revocation of his probation on a conviction for child abuse—recklessly causing harm. Attorney Ellen Krahn
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208691 - 2018-02-19
[PDF]
State v. Steven J. Fischer
it conditioned his probation on a no-contact provision in regard to his stepchildren. Because this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13494 - 2017-09-21
it conditioned his probation on a no-contact provision in regard to his stepchildren. Because this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13494 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert W. Miller
property in the most recent case precipitated the revocation of probation in the two older cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2410 - 2005-03-31
property in the most recent case precipitated the revocation of probation in the two older cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2410 - 2005-03-31