Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6891 - 6900 of 64229 for records/1000.
Search results 6891 - 6900 of 64229 for records/1000.
CA Blank Order
not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102773 - 2013-10-08
not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102773 - 2013-10-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not exercise his right to file a response. After reviewing the no-merit report and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193657 - 2017-09-21
not exercise his right to file a response. After reviewing the no-merit report and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193657 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
litem have filed briefs. We have, therefore, only the record on which to base our decision. Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30796 - 2014-09-15
litem have filed briefs. We have, therefore, only the record on which to base our decision. Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30796 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
submitted to the court is not in the record before this court on appeal. No. 2013AP682-CR 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102338 - 2017-09-21
submitted to the court is not in the record before this court on appeal. No. 2013AP682-CR 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102338 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Terry L. Van Drese
in the same manner as all trial court discretionary acts. Id. "[T]here should be evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13422 - 2017-09-21
in the same manner as all trial court discretionary acts. Id. "[T]here should be evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13422 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155049 - 2017-09-21
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155049 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brian S.
court's exercise of discretion, we first look to the record to see if discretion was in fact exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10233 - 2005-03-31
court's exercise of discretion, we first look to the record to see if discretion was in fact exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10233 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92104 - 2013-01-23
independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92104 - 2013-01-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.21. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576041 - 2022-10-13
809.21. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576041 - 2022-10-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166547 - 2017-09-21
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166547 - 2017-09-21