Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 68901 - 68910 of 83653 for case search.
Search results 68901 - 68910 of 83653 for case search.
State v. John A. Aschenbrener
that Laxton does not control in this case and that a separate finding of serious difficulty in controlling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3326 - 2005-03-31
that Laxton does not control in this case and that a separate finding of serious difficulty in controlling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3326 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark S. Brown
2005 WI 49 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2005AP205-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17879 - 2005-05-02
2005 WI 49 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2005AP205-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17879 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
State v. Gary L. Janda
case where a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is raised. State v. Curtis, 218 Wis. 2d 550
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2387 - 2017-09-19
case where a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is raised. State v. Curtis, 218 Wis. 2d 550
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2387 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
THE COURT: Okay. You understand on all those cases where they’re misdemeanors where you’re charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15440 - 2017-09-21
THE COURT: Okay. You understand on all those cases where they’re misdemeanors where you’re charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15440 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Administrator explained that when judges rotate, the incoming judge takes new issues brought into the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99716 - 2013-07-23
Administrator explained that when judges rotate, the incoming judge takes new issues brought into the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99716 - 2013-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
reconsider only to correct an “error of law”; the court’s stated reasons for reconsidering in this case were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83627 - 2012-06-13
reconsider only to correct an “error of law”; the court’s stated reasons for reconsidering in this case were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83627 - 2012-06-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806514 - 2024-05-29
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806514 - 2024-05-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252153 - 2020-01-07
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252153 - 2020-01-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a copy of the report and filed a response.2 Following our initial review of the case, we directed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264501 - 2020-06-16
a copy of the report and filed a response.2 Following our initial review of the case, we directed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264501 - 2020-06-16