Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 691 - 700 of 68275 for did.
Search results 691 - 700 of 68275 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
Miller’s motion for reconsideration did not present any new issues, however, his appeal is untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47472 - 2014-09-15
Miller’s motion for reconsideration did not present any new issues, however, his appeal is untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47472 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the system to avoid juvenile court jurisdiction. The circuit court found the prosecutor did not charge Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30217 - 2007-09-10
the system to avoid juvenile court jurisdiction. The circuit court found the prosecutor did not charge Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30217 - 2007-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). Martinez did not deny that Carloni administered the warnings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34571 - 2008-11-17
of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). Martinez did not deny that Carloni administered the warnings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34571 - 2008-11-17
COURT OF APPEALS
on the merits of his case. Because Miller’s motion for reconsideration did not present any new issues, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47472 - 2010-03-02
on the merits of his case. Because Miller’s motion for reconsideration did not present any new issues, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47472 - 2010-03-02
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶4 The State countered that Heroux’s motion did not satisfy the criteria set out in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109735 - 2014-04-01
. ¶4 The State countered that Heroux’s motion did not satisfy the criteria set out in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109735 - 2014-04-01
COURT OF APPEALS
…. And what, if anything, did you observe when you went to that location? A We went to the location. As we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132821 - 2015-01-12
…. And what, if anything, did you observe when you went to that location? A We went to the location. As we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132821 - 2015-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
that the officer did not use reasonable means in conveying the implied consent warnings to Galvan and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55130 - 2010-10-05
that the officer did not use reasonable means in conveying the implied consent warnings to Galvan and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55130 - 2010-10-05
State v. Paul D. Martin
breath and Martin answered “No.” Martin did not state why he would not take the breath test, but offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5773 - 2005-03-31
breath and Martin answered “No.” Martin did not state why he would not take the breath test, but offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5773 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that adoption serves the best interest of [her] child” and if the State did not meet its burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846577 - 2024-09-10
that adoption serves the best interest of [her] child” and if the State did not meet its burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846577 - 2024-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
by the victim to various people after the victim had testified that she did not remember any of the events
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30565 - 2007-10-16
by the victim to various people after the victim had testified that she did not remember any of the events
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30565 - 2007-10-16