Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6901 - 6910 of 57365 for id.
Search results 6901 - 6910 of 57365 for id.
State v. Thomas E. Dahl
pornographic tapes from the defendant, and turned them over to the FBI. Id. at 651-52. FBI agents then viewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3637 - 2005-03-31
pornographic tapes from the defendant, and turned them over to the FBI. Id. at 651-52. FBI agents then viewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3637 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
to the truthfulness of the contents of the notice. Id. Second, the notice “must contain a statement showing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93049 - 2013-02-14
to the truthfulness of the contents of the notice. Id. Second, the notice “must contain a statement showing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93049 - 2013-02-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
or issue preclusion. Id., reconsideration denied (Sept. 19, 2007). No. 2008AP2789 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37587 - 2014-09-15
or issue preclusion. Id., reconsideration denied (Sept. 19, 2007). No. 2008AP2789 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37587 - 2014-09-15
State v. Thomas M. Milligan
if there is a “reasonable probability” that the “result of the proceeding would have been different.” Id. at 320-21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2346 - 2005-03-31
if there is a “reasonable probability” that the “result of the proceeding would have been different.” Id. at 320-21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2346 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
evidence that a new factor exists. Id., ¶36. Second, the defendant must show that the new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713494 - 2023-10-11
evidence that a new factor exists. Id., ¶36. Second, the defendant must show that the new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713494 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
State v. Jesse J. Schloemer
upon whether the vehicle was lawfully stopped. Id. We independently review the legality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9138 - 2017-09-19
upon whether the vehicle was lawfully stopped. Id. We independently review the legality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9138 - 2017-09-19
State v. Donald F. Sheffey
for a retrial by exercising a protected right.” Id. The defendant “bears the burden of establishing that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24910 - 2006-04-26
for a retrial by exercising a protected right.” Id. The defendant “bears the burden of establishing that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24910 - 2006-04-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
a condition of return due to her incarceration. Id., ¶¶10-11, 55. The supreme court held “a parent’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28141 - 2007-02-19
a condition of return due to her incarceration. Id., ¶¶10-11, 55. The supreme court held “a parent’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28141 - 2007-02-19
Dorothy A. Wessel v. Emmett D. Wessel
is based on the facts appearing in the record and the appropriate and applicable law. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11645 - 2005-03-31
is based on the facts appearing in the record and the appropriate and applicable law. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11645 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
irrelevant or improper factors, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28635 - 2014-09-15
irrelevant or improper factors, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28635 - 2014-09-15