Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6901 - 6910 of 57152 for id.
Search results 6901 - 6910 of 57152 for id.
[PDF]
NOTICE
and his arguments are difficult to follow. No. 2008AP948-CR 4 Id. When the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35638 - 2014-09-15
and his arguments are difficult to follow. No. 2008AP948-CR 4 Id. When the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35638 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether a stop is reasonable is based upon the totality of the facts and circumstances. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36259 - 2009-04-22
. Whether a stop is reasonable is based upon the totality of the facts and circumstances. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36259 - 2009-04-22
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonableness is a question of law we review without deference. Id. ¶6 The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28840 - 2007-04-30
of reasonableness is a question of law we review without deference. Id. ¶6 The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28840 - 2007-04-30
[PDF]
Pierce County v. Amy F.
to a CHIPS order.” Id. Thus, there need not be a six-month window from the last CHIPS order to the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7551 - 2017-09-19
to a CHIPS order.” Id. Thus, there need not be a six-month window from the last CHIPS order to the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7551 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and custody) that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.’” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230221 - 2018-12-12
and custody) that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.’” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230221 - 2018-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise of discretion has been demonstrated, we follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35638 - 2009-02-23
, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise of discretion has been demonstrated, we follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35638 - 2009-02-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
exists. Id., ¶36. A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285748 - 2020-09-09
exists. Id., ¶36. A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285748 - 2020-09-09
Pierce County v. Amy F.
notices. Id., ¶2. While § 48.356(2) required “any … order” placing a child outside the home to include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7551 - 2005-03-31
notices. Id., ¶2. While § 48.356(2) required “any … order” placing a child outside the home to include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7551 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86101 - 2012-08-14
which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86101 - 2012-08-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the application of constitutional principles to those facts. Id. The parties dispute whether Officer Shipman’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237573 - 2019-03-14
the application of constitutional principles to those facts. Id. The parties dispute whether Officer Shipman’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237573 - 2019-03-14