Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 69001 - 69010 of 83693 for case search.
Search results 69001 - 69010 of 83693 for case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111458 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111458 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case. See generally State v. Gallion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132458 - 2017-09-21
the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case. See generally State v. Gallion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132458 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
… for the offense.” We agree with the State. No. 2007AP814-CR 4 ¶5 This case requires us to interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31934 - 2014-09-15
… for the offense.” We agree with the State. No. 2007AP814-CR 4 ¶5 This case requires us to interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31934 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conviction was summarily reversed and his case was remanded to the circuit court, which, in a modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145352 - 2017-09-21
conviction was summarily reversed and his case was remanded to the circuit court, which, in a modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145352 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2016AP1819-CR 2 conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193751 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2016AP1819-CR 2 conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193751 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
at issue in this case are the statements made by Officer Clark. We do not need to decide whether the ALJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51331 - 2014-09-15
at issue in this case are the statements made by Officer Clark. We do not need to decide whether the ALJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51331 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Charles Gray Beverage Company, Inc. v. Utica Mutual Insurance Company
affidavits, to determine whether that party has made a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10410 - 2017-09-20
affidavits, to determine whether that party has made a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10410 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
was in error, and he indicates that in each case, he is being subject to an ex post facto law. First, Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46411 - 2014-09-15
was in error, and he indicates that in each case, he is being subject to an ex post facto law. First, Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46411 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234701 - 2019-02-12
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234701 - 2019-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
imposed in each case should call for the minimum amount of custody or confinement which is consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34136 - 2008-09-29
imposed in each case should call for the minimum amount of custody or confinement which is consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34136 - 2008-09-29