Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6911 - 6920 of 69450 for as he.
Search results 6911 - 6920 of 69450 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. Richard O. Mattingly
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Mattingly contends that he was denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13569 - 2017-09-21
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Mattingly contends that he was denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13569 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kweku Fitzpatrick
to the trunk of a car after the fight, obtain a gun and fire one shot as he returned to the apartment building
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8525 - 2017-09-19
to the trunk of a car after the fight, obtain a gun and fire one shot as he returned to the apartment building
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8525 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testified that he has been a school bus driver for twenty-one years and was dropping children off after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752898 - 2024-01-24
testified that he has been a school bus driver for twenty-one years and was dropping children off after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752898 - 2024-01-24
Rogelio Cabral v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. PER CURIAM. Rogelio Cabral was injured in the course of his employment. He sought worker's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8390 - 2005-03-31
. PER CURIAM. Rogelio Cabral was injured in the course of his employment. He sought worker's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8390 - 2005-03-31
Bernie J. Cudnohosky v. David H. Schwarz
and affirming revocation of his parole. On appeal he claims that the “department”[1] did not act according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13148 - 2005-03-31
and affirming revocation of his parole. On appeal he claims that the “department”[1] did not act according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13148 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patrick L. M.
order waiving juvenile court jurisdiction under Wis. Stat. § 938.18.[2] He argues that the juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6130 - 2005-03-31
order waiving juvenile court jurisdiction under Wis. Stat. § 938.18.[2] He argues that the juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6130 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. At the time of his arrest, he had two prior OWI convictions, the first from 1990 and the second from 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558959 - 2022-08-25
. At the time of his arrest, he had two prior OWI convictions, the first from 1990 and the second from 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558959 - 2022-08-25
State v. Travis Allen
it admitted an incriminating custodial statement. Allen argues that he did not understand his Miranda rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18461 - 2005-06-06
it admitted an incriminating custodial statement. Allen argues that he did not understand his Miranda rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18461 - 2005-06-06
[PDF]
State v. James D. Lammers
causing damage to property. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24598 - 2017-09-21
causing damage to property. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24598 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he and Pope had discussed how to proceed, and that Pope wanted to accept the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191400 - 2017-09-21
that he and Pope had discussed how to proceed, and that Pope wanted to accept the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191400 - 2017-09-21