Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6911 - 6920 of 19220 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 6911 - 6920 of 19220 for transfer by affidavit.
[PDF]
State v. Eugene Keeler
. App. 1993). Keeler's motion for an evidentiary hearing was not supported by an affidavit regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8070 - 2017-09-19
. App. 1993). Keeler's motion for an evidentiary hearing was not supported by an affidavit regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8070 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not personally served on Wood. Instead, the Outagamie County Sheriff’s Office filed an affidavit on October 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=434379 - 2021-09-30
not personally served on Wood. Instead, the Outagamie County Sheriff’s Office filed an affidavit on October 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=434379 - 2021-09-30
First American Title Insurance Company v. Dennis A. Dahlmann
) along with an affidavit indicating there were no changes to the size or location of the improvements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19926 - 2005-10-12
) along with an affidavit indicating there were no changes to the size or location of the improvements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19926 - 2005-10-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The “new factor” proffered for sentence modification was an affidavit from Dixon in which he recanted his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645817 - 2023-04-18
. The “new factor” proffered for sentence modification was an affidavit from Dixon in which he recanted his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645817 - 2023-04-18
State v. Kenneth L. Larson
to suppress, the trial court found that the affidavit on which the no-knock search warrant was issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9365 - 2005-03-31
to suppress, the trial court found that the affidavit on which the no-knock search warrant was issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9365 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
). The County alleged in the supporting affidavit that the reason for the motion was Lucille’s admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3920 - 2017-09-20
). The County alleged in the supporting affidavit that the reason for the motion was Lucille’s admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3920 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to introduce affidavits supporting his self-defense argument, arguing the affidavits bore on whether Brown’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141769 - 2017-09-21
to introduce affidavits supporting his self-defense argument, arguing the affidavits bore on whether Brown’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141769 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael V. Hendricks
that Hendricks files an affidavit with the trial court verifying that he did not contribute to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18615 - 2017-09-21
that Hendricks files an affidavit with the trial court verifying that he did not contribute to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18615 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
was “unknowingly overlooked by all parties.” Crandall proffers an affidavit from Bridgett that alleges she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27267 - 2014-09-15
was “unknowingly overlooked by all parties.” Crandall proffers an affidavit from Bridgett that alleges she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27267 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that McPhail presented no evidence through testimony or an affidavit that he actually requested a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213610 - 2018-05-30
that McPhail presented no evidence through testimony or an affidavit that he actually requested a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213610 - 2018-05-30