Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6911 - 6920 of 73047 for we.
Search results 6911 - 6920 of 73047 for we.
Donna Shirley v. William J. Mallory
on allegedly overpaid family support. We conclude that the trial court did not err and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10073 - 2005-03-31
on allegedly overpaid family support. We conclude that the trial court did not err and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10073 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
memo briefs. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.17 (2007-08).[1] We reverse the judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42499 - 2009-10-21
memo briefs. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.17 (2007-08).[1] We reverse the judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42499 - 2009-10-21
COURT OF APPEALS
or to reinstate Maddox’s direct appeal rights. We conclude that Maddox has not alleged a sufficient reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29964 - 2007-08-13
or to reinstate Maddox’s direct appeal rights. We conclude that Maddox has not alleged a sufficient reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29964 - 2007-08-13
State v. Juan B. Garcia
to the State’s failure to comply with a pretrial discovery order. We agree, and reverse and remand the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6313 - 2005-03-31
to the State’s failure to comply with a pretrial discovery order. We agree, and reverse and remand the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6313 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the State’s introduction of evidence of other acts of violence by Little against the victim. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90168 - 2014-09-15
to the State’s introduction of evidence of other acts of violence by Little against the victim. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90168 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 971.23(9) (2019-20),1 that it would be using DNA evidence at trial. We conclude the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=359954 - 2021-04-27
. STAT. § 971.23(9) (2019-20),1 that it would be using DNA evidence at trial. We conclude the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=359954 - 2021-04-27
State v. Roger F. Lewis
must be vacated. We disagree and affirm the revocation order. The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9990 - 2005-03-31
must be vacated. We disagree and affirm the revocation order. The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9990 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and for presentence plea withdrawal) were preserved for but never raised on direct appeal. We therefore conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28386 - 2014-09-15
and for presentence plea withdrawal) were preserved for but never raised on direct appeal. We therefore conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28386 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Michael R. Luterbach v. Denise M. Luterbach
1995 order denying his motion to modify the August 1995 child support order. While we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9672 - 2017-09-19
1995 order denying his motion to modify the August 1995 child support order. While we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9672 - 2017-09-19
State v. Scott E. Brandstetter
for each phone call are multiplicitous and that half the bail jumping convictions should be vacated. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6293 - 2005-03-31
for each phone call are multiplicitous and that half the bail jumping convictions should be vacated. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6293 - 2005-03-31