Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6921 - 6930 of 69480 for as he.
Search results 6921 - 6930 of 69480 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration. He asserts the court erroneously exercised its discretion and failed to apply the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75140 - 2014-09-15
for reconsideration. He asserts the court erroneously exercised its discretion and failed to apply the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75140 - 2014-09-15
State v. Joseph Eckstein
conviction for conspiracy and solicitation to commit first-degree intentional homicide. Eckstein claims he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5713 - 2005-03-31
conviction for conspiracy and solicitation to commit first-degree intentional homicide. Eckstein claims he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5713 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jon M. Schirmang
contends that the information he was given prior to refusing to take a chemical intoxication test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11417 - 2005-03-31
contends that the information he was given prior to refusing to take a chemical intoxication test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11417 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Travis Allen
when it admitted an incriminating custodial statement. Allen argues that he did not understand his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18461 - 2017-09-21
when it admitted an incriminating custodial statement. Allen argues that he did not understand his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18461 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James D. Lammers
causing damage to property. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24598 - 2017-09-21
causing damage to property. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24598 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
separate criminal cases.1 He argues the circuit court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594255 - 2022-11-30
separate criminal cases.1 He argues the circuit court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594255 - 2022-11-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the room; eventually, the man reached for the gun and said, “Let me make sure the safety is on.” He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248644 - 2019-10-15
the room; eventually, the man reached for the gun and said, “Let me make sure the safety is on.” He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248644 - 2019-10-15
[PDF]
State v. Patrick L. M.
. § 938.18. 2 He argues that the juvenile court erroneously exercised discretion in waiving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6130 - 2017-09-19
. § 938.18. 2 He argues that the juvenile court erroneously exercised discretion in waiving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6130 - 2017-09-19
State v. Richard O. Mattingly
postconviction motion for a new trial. Mattingly contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13569 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion for a new trial. Mattingly contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13569 - 2005-03-31
Bernie J. Cudnohosky v. David H. Schwarz
and affirming revocation of his parole. On appeal he claims that the “department”[1] did not act according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13148 - 2005-03-31
and affirming revocation of his parole. On appeal he claims that the “department”[1] did not act according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13148 - 2005-03-31