Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6921 - 6930 of 57379 for id.
Search results 6921 - 6930 of 57379 for id.
State v. Anthony J. Dentici
court’s informed and reasoned discretion. See id., 173 Wis. 2d at 136–137, 496 N.W.2d at 147. A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16070 - 2005-03-31
court’s informed and reasoned discretion. See id., 173 Wis. 2d at 136–137, 496 N.W.2d at 147. A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16070 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of reasonableness.” Id. at 687-88. To demonstrate prejudice, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134027 - 2015-01-27
of reasonableness.” Id. at 687-88. To demonstrate prejudice, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134027 - 2015-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
adopt the inference that supports the verdict. Id. Applying this deferential standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210829 - 2018-04-10
adopt the inference that supports the verdict. Id. Applying this deferential standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210829 - 2018-04-10
COURT OF APPEALS
injustice. Id. Determining whether a sufficient factual basis exists lies within the discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46317 - 2010-02-02
injustice. Id. Determining whether a sufficient factual basis exists lies within the discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46317 - 2010-02-02
State v. Phillip W. Spagnola
beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. at 525, 442 N.W.2d at 41. We presume a statute is constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8297 - 2005-03-31
beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. at 525, 442 N.W.2d at 41. We presume a statute is constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8297 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
a condition of return due to her incarceration. Id., ¶¶10-11, 55. The supreme court held “a parent’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28141 - 2007-02-19
a condition of return due to her incarceration. Id., ¶¶10-11, 55. The supreme court held “a parent’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28141 - 2007-02-19
State v. D.L.S.
assistance.” Id. at 690. There is a strong presumption that counsel “rendered adequate assistance and made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6126 - 2005-03-31
assistance.” Id. at 690. There is a strong presumption that counsel “rendered adequate assistance and made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6126 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nicholas V. Maiorano
is reliable.” Id. Stated another way, to satisfy the prejudice- prong, “‘[t]he defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26087 - 2017-09-21
is reliable.” Id. Stated another way, to satisfy the prejudice- prong, “‘[t]he defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26087 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Pierce County v. Amy F.
to a CHIPS order.” Id. Thus, there need not be a six-month window from the last CHIPS order to the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7551 - 2017-09-19
to a CHIPS order.” Id. Thus, there need not be a six-month window from the last CHIPS order to the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7551 - 2017-09-19
State v. Donald F. Sheffey
for a retrial by exercising a protected right.” Id. The defendant “bears the burden of establishing that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24910 - 2006-04-26
for a retrial by exercising a protected right.” Id. The defendant “bears the burden of establishing that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24910 - 2006-04-26