Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6921 - 6930 of 57371 for id.
Search results 6921 - 6930 of 57371 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
decision to determine whether that discretion was erroneously exercised.” Id., ¶22. An erroneous exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30088 - 2007-08-27
decision to determine whether that discretion was erroneously exercised.” Id., ¶22. An erroneous exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30088 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is for the jury to decide. Id. at 504. No. 2011AP1960-CR 3 ¶5 We view the evidence in the light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118202 - 2014-09-15
is for the jury to decide. Id. at 504. No. 2011AP1960-CR 3 ¶5 We view the evidence in the light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118202 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86101 - 2012-08-14
which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86101 - 2012-08-14
State v. Barry A. Schuh
constitutional guarantees is a question of law we review independently. See id. at 388-89. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2886 - 2005-03-31
constitutional guarantees is a question of law we review independently. See id. at 388-89. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2886 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutionality of a search or seizure de novo, id. at 138. The arresting officer must have reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123386 - 2017-09-21
the constitutionality of a search or seizure de novo, id. at 138. The arresting officer must have reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123386 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
demonstrates that [the defendant] is not entitled to relief.” Id., ¶17 (citation omitted). ¶3 Allen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141253 - 2017-09-21
demonstrates that [the defendant] is not entitled to relief.” Id., ¶17 (citation omitted). ¶3 Allen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141253 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
or improper factors, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise of discretion has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28635 - 2007-04-02
or improper factors, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise of discretion has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28635 - 2007-04-02
[PDF]
State v. Jesse J. Schloemer
upon whether the vehicle was lawfully stopped. Id. We independently review the legality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9138 - 2017-09-19
upon whether the vehicle was lawfully stopped. Id. We independently review the legality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9138 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
when it provides a “rational and explainable basis” for the sentence. Id., ¶39. In order to do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28217 - 2014-09-15
when it provides a “rational and explainable basis” for the sentence. Id., ¶39. In order to do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28217 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the person was operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Id., ¶15. Whether there was probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76641 - 2012-01-17
that the person was operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Id., ¶15. Whether there was probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76641 - 2012-01-17