Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6921 - 6930 of 33548 for ii.

Michael Younglove v. City of Oak Creek Fire and Police Commission
de novo. The dissent assumes that this is true. For the reasons stated in Part II of this opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12531 - 2005-03-31

State v. James Nesbitt
809.62, Stats. No. 97-2941-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13113 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2021CT741 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=672242 - 2023-06-28

State v. Kenneth R. McGrew
argument that the statute violates due process and equal protection.[5] II. Duty to Preserve Evidence ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4570 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
than [sic], may the State look back further to add to the count of DUI’s and increase the penalty. ii
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80607 - 2012-04-09

COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2009AP331 Cir. Ct. No. 2007SC1608 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43195 - 2009-11-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2024CF1687 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1080213 - 2026-02-25

Associated Bank - Milwaukee v. Charles L. Wendt
. No. 00-0483 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2289 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2017CF1380 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963506 - 2025-06-04

[PDF] State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Acuity
operates to deny coverage more directly. ¶11 Under 1.f.(1)(a), (1)(d) and (1)(d)(ii) of the Exclusions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7564 - 2017-09-19