Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6931 - 6940 of 68274 for did.
Search results 6931 - 6940 of 68274 for did.
State v. Sarah E. Johnson
. Johnson said that she did not leave fingerprints because she used her shirttail when she touched anything
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4000 - 2005-03-31
. Johnson said that she did not leave fingerprints because she used her shirttail when she touched anything
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4000 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
his pre-plea and post-plea counsel rendered ineffective assistance, the former because they did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34510 - 2008-11-11
his pre-plea and post-plea counsel rendered ineffective assistance, the former because they did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34510 - 2008-11-11
Kathrine I. Barber v. Anne Schmitz Arnesen
that her evidence was sufficient because she did not need expert testimony to show that Dr. Arnesen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5978 - 2005-03-31
that her evidence was sufficient because she did not need expert testimony to show that Dr. Arnesen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5978 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul Alan LeRose
he was charged. LeRose concludes that his contract with the SPD did not prohibit double billing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15681 - 2005-03-31
he was charged. LeRose concludes that his contract with the SPD did not prohibit double billing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15681 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2023AP1884 3 ¶3 J.L. did not satisfy the conditions for Grace’s return. Although he had supervised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=746454 - 2024-01-03
. No. 2023AP1884 3 ¶3 J.L. did not satisfy the conditions for Grace’s return. Although he had supervised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=746454 - 2024-01-03
State v. James Nesbitt
that the repeater portion of his sentence was not authorized by law because he did not admit and the State failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13113 - 2005-03-31
that the repeater portion of his sentence was not authorized by law because he did not admit and the State failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13113 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tommie Thames
counsel because appellate counsel did not raise ineffective assistance of trial counsel based on several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17647 - 2017-09-21
counsel because appellate counsel did not raise ineffective assistance of trial counsel based on several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17647 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to counsel of her choice by not raising this issue earlier, and her motion did not allege facts sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134259 - 2017-09-21
to counsel of her choice by not raising this issue earlier, and her motion did not allege facts sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134259 - 2017-09-21
State v. Shawn Riley
was not explained to him by his second and third lawyers; (2) his second lawyer did not discuss or pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2378 - 2005-03-31
was not explained to him by his second and third lawyers; (2) his second lawyer did not discuss or pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2378 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael S. Behnken
read-in and dismissed. Although the plea questionnaire did not specify that the counts included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3287 - 2005-03-31
read-in and dismissed. Although the plea questionnaire did not specify that the counts included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3287 - 2005-03-31