Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6931 - 6940 of 55449 for n c.
Search results 6931 - 6940 of 55449 for n c.
State v. Lawrence P. Peters, Jr.
or justness of the plea hearing.[13] By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. No. 99-1940-CR(C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15780 - 2005-03-31
or justness of the plea hearing.[13] By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. No. 99-1940-CR(C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15780 - 2005-03-31
WI App 114 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2435-CR Complete Titl...
. § 971.08(1)(c) provided sufficient notice under Padilla.[3] Ortiz-Mondragon appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123236 - 2014-11-17
. § 971.08(1)(c) provided sufficient notice under Padilla.[3] Ortiz-Mondragon appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123236 - 2014-11-17
2009 WI APP 166
. Jeffrey C. McPike, Defendant-Respondent. Opinion Filed: October 29, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42765 - 2009-11-23
. Jeffrey C. McPike, Defendant-Respondent. Opinion Filed: October 29, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42765 - 2009-11-23
[PDF]
Rule Order
not affect a substantive right of parties. (b) Rule relating to the administration of the courts. (c
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158412 - 2017-09-21
not affect a substantive right of parties. (b) Rule relating to the administration of the courts. (c
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158412 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
I believe is A-R-Q- U-A-N. He was – or he is the defendant’s brother. And there may have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168437 - 2017-09-21
I believe is A-R-Q- U-A-N. He was – or he is the defendant’s brother. And there may have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168437 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William E. Draughon III
on the brief of William C. Wolford, assistant attorney general, and Peggy A. Lautenschlager, attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18636 - 2017-09-21
on the brief of William C. Wolford, assistant attorney general, and Peggy A. Lautenschlager, attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18636 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 137
for Door County: PETER C. DILTZ, Judge. Reversed and causes remanded with directions; attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54419 - 2014-09-15
for Door County: PETER C. DILTZ, Judge. Reversed and causes remanded with directions; attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54419 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEALS from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: FREDERICK C. ROSA, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365541 - 2021-05-11
. APPEALS from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: FREDERICK C. ROSA, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365541 - 2021-05-11
[PDF]
State v. Ryan E. Baker
, setting forth … facts demonstrating his or her poverty. (c) The finding and order of the court under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7347 - 2017-09-20
, setting forth … facts demonstrating his or her poverty. (c) The finding and order of the court under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7347 - 2017-09-20
Frontsheet
"eligibility of the petitioner for reinstatement" in SCR 31.11(1m)(c) is not interpreted to require the OLR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28981 - 2007-05-10
"eligibility of the petitioner for reinstatement" in SCR 31.11(1m)(c) is not interpreted to require the OLR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28981 - 2007-05-10