Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6931 - 6940 of 50331 for writ of certiorari forms.

[PDF] State v. Matthew J. Knapp
was not certain whether the consent form was signed before or after the conversation between George and Knapp
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16422 - 2017-09-21

State v. Matthew J. Knapp
to a search of the apartment. Though Roets was not certain whether the consent form was signed before
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16422 - 2013-01-08

[PDF] SC Table of Pending Cases - added recently accepted case 2020AP333; added decisions in 2018AP2005
, CERQ = Certified Question, BYPA = Petition to bypass, ORIG = Original Action, WRIT = Petition
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673579 - 2023-06-26

Duane S. Jorgensen v. James Barber
a writ of error the appellate court orders a new trial or reverses or modifies the judgment or order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6590 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Amended rules petition 06-08
that govern commencement of action, service and filing, form of papers, time for filing, filing by facsimile
/supreme/docs/0608petitionamend.pdf - 2010-01-20

[PDF] State v. Kenneth Pringle, Jr.
so when he failed to challenge his revocation by certiorari. We disagree. ¶15 The State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26448 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Terrence Miller
an investigatory stop will be examined by the United States Supreme Court. The Court has accepted certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14785 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Pastori M. Balele v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
Supreme Court subsequently denied Balele’s petition for certiorari. 8 Although the commission stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14585 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Pastori M. Balele v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
Supreme Court subsequently denied Balele’s petition for certiorari. 8 Although the commission stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14502 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kenneth Pringle, Jr.
so when he failed to challenge his revocation by certiorari. We disagree. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26448 - 2006-09-11