Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 69321 - 69330 of 83656 for case search.
Search results 69321 - 69330 of 83656 for case search.
Frontsheet
2013 WI 26 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 12AP1245-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94427 - 2013-04-16
2013 WI 26 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 12AP1245-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94427 - 2013-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 Although notices of appeal were filed on both case numbers 2009TR4760 and 2009TR4804
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103152 - 2017-09-21
2 Although notices of appeal were filed on both case numbers 2009TR4760 and 2009TR4804
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103152 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the recommitment hearing. This discrepancy is ultimately not dispositive to the outcome of this case, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422646 - 2021-09-08
at the recommitment hearing. This discrepancy is ultimately not dispositive to the outcome of this case, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422646 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
State v. Christopher S.
, in which case a written statement of the reasons for holding a child in custody shall be substituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9506 - 2017-09-19
, in which case a written statement of the reasons for holding a child in custody shall be substituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9506 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 402, 565 N.W.2d 506 (1997). Contrary to Hampton’s assertion, the Setagord cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201514 - 2017-11-07
, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 402, 565 N.W.2d 506 (1997). Contrary to Hampton’s assertion, the Setagord cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201514 - 2017-11-07
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
for the Wisconsin Substance Abuse Program because it was not “appropriate in this case.” The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98452 - 2014-09-15
for the Wisconsin Substance Abuse Program because it was not “appropriate in this case.” The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98452 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2007AP1868 Cir. Ct. No. 1989CV16174
. This case involves the latest summary judgment dispute over insurance coverage in an ongoing lawsuit which
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35616 - 2014-09-15
. This case involves the latest summary judgment dispute over insurance coverage in an ongoing lawsuit which
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35616 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that their testimony would have undermined the State’s case against him. ¶5 We conclude that Earl fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53150 - 2014-09-15
that their testimony would have undermined the State’s case against him. ¶5 We conclude that Earl fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53150 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Wayne Cornelius
. at 482-83. This rule is applicable to attempted first-degree intentional homicide cases, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18658 - 2017-09-21
. at 482-83. This rule is applicable to attempted first-degree intentional homicide cases, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18658 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Frank Machado
COUNSEL We recite the procedural history of this case because it is the underpinning for our holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8993 - 2017-09-19
COUNSEL We recite the procedural history of this case because it is the underpinning for our holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8993 - 2017-09-19