Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6941 - 6950 of 57358 for id.
Search results 6941 - 6950 of 57358 for id.
[PDF]
Eau Claire County v. Craig M. Mader
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 797-98. ¶6 Here, we address whether Holbrook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18255 - 2017-09-21
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 797-98. ¶6 Here, we address whether Holbrook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18255 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
suspicion to conduct a traffic stop is a question of constitutional fact. Id., ¶10. We uphold the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82866 - 2012-05-21
suspicion to conduct a traffic stop is a question of constitutional fact. Id., ¶10. We uphold the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82866 - 2012-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
demonstrates that [the defendant] is not entitled to relief.” Id., ¶17 (citation omitted). ¶3 Allen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141253 - 2015-05-05
demonstrates that [the defendant] is not entitled to relief.” Id., ¶17 (citation omitted). ¶3 Allen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141253 - 2015-05-05
State v. Jesse J. Schloemer
the vehicle was lawfully stopped. Id. We independently review the legality of the initial stop as a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9138 - 2005-03-31
the vehicle was lawfully stopped. Id. We independently review the legality of the initial stop as a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9138 - 2005-03-31
State v. Levi Booth
facts that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20701 - 2005-12-19
facts that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20701 - 2005-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
evidence that a new factor exists. Id., ¶36. Second, the defendant must show that the new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713494 - 2023-10-11
evidence that a new factor exists. Id., ¶36. Second, the defendant must show that the new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713494 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
State v. Jesse J. Schloemer
upon whether the vehicle was lawfully stopped. Id. We independently review the legality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9138 - 2017-09-19
upon whether the vehicle was lawfully stopped. Id. We independently review the legality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9138 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lukas Metnik v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
of that discretion when it bases its discretionary decision upon No. 00-2412 3 an error of law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2994 - 2017-09-19
of that discretion when it bases its discretionary decision upon No. 00-2412 3 an error of law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2994 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise of discretion has been demonstrated, we follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35638 - 2009-02-23
, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise of discretion has been demonstrated, we follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35638 - 2009-02-23
State v. Donald F. Sheffey
for a retrial by exercising a protected right.” Id. The defendant “bears the burden of establishing that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24910 - 2006-04-26
for a retrial by exercising a protected right.” Id. The defendant “bears the burden of establishing that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24910 - 2006-04-26