Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6941 - 6950 of 57365 for id.

[PDF] NOTICE
should not be immune because their duty to prevent an escape was ministerial. Id. at 273. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35979 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
the termination of parental rights. Id. at 518, 519 (citing per curiam on motion for rehearing). Our supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37587 - 2009-07-13

[PDF] State v. Phillip W. Spagnola
a reasonable doubt. Id. at 525, 442 N.W.2d at 41. We presume a statute is constitutional. Schramek v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8297 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
is also a question of law that we decide independently of the trial court. Id. A contract is ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46457 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutionality of a search or seizure de novo, id. at 138. The arresting officer must have reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123386 - 2017-09-21

State v. Levi Booth
facts that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20701 - 2005-12-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the application of constitutional principles to those facts. Id. The parties dispute whether Officer Shipman’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237573 - 2019-03-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is for the jury to decide. Id. at 504. No. 2011AP1960-CR 3 ¶5 We view the evidence in the light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118202 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
suspicion to conduct a traffic stop is a question of constitutional fact. Id., ¶10. We uphold the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82866 - 2012-05-21

COURT OF APPEALS
demonstrates that [the defendant] is not entitled to relief.” Id., ¶17 (citation omitted). ¶3 Allen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141253 - 2015-05-05