Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6941 - 6950 of 57351 for id.
Search results 6941 - 6950 of 57351 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence is for the jury to decide. Id. at 504. ¶5 We view the evidence in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118202 - 2014-07-28
of the evidence is for the jury to decide. Id. at 504. ¶5 We view the evidence in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118202 - 2014-07-28
[PDF]
Eau Claire County v. Craig M. Mader
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 797-98. ¶6 Here, we address whether Holbrook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18255 - 2017-09-21
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 797-98. ¶6 Here, we address whether Holbrook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18255 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
suspicion to conduct a traffic stop is a question of constitutional fact. Id., ¶10. We uphold the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82866 - 2012-05-21
suspicion to conduct a traffic stop is a question of constitutional fact. Id., ¶10. We uphold the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82866 - 2012-05-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” Id. (citation omitted). This is a “common sense” test, id. at 139
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86101 - 2014-09-15
, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” Id. (citation omitted). This is a “common sense” test, id. at 139
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86101 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
demonstrates that [the defendant] is not entitled to relief.” Id., ¶17 (citation omitted). ¶3 Allen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141253 - 2015-05-05
demonstrates that [the defendant] is not entitled to relief.” Id., ¶17 (citation omitted). ¶3 Allen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141253 - 2015-05-05
State v. Jesse J. Schloemer
the vehicle was lawfully stopped. Id. We independently review the legality of the initial stop as a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9138 - 2005-03-31
the vehicle was lawfully stopped. Id. We independently review the legality of the initial stop as a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9138 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the person was operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Id., ¶15. Whether there was probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76641 - 2012-01-17
that the person was operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Id., ¶15. Whether there was probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76641 - 2012-01-17
State v. Levi Booth
facts that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20701 - 2005-12-19
facts that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20701 - 2005-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
evidence that a new factor exists. Id., ¶36. Second, the defendant must show that the new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713494 - 2023-10-11
evidence that a new factor exists. Id., ¶36. Second, the defendant must show that the new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713494 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
State v. Jesse J. Schloemer
upon whether the vehicle was lawfully stopped. Id. We independently review the legality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9138 - 2017-09-19
upon whether the vehicle was lawfully stopped. Id. We independently review the legality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9138 - 2017-09-19