Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 69451 - 69460 of 83434 for case codes/1000.
Search results 69451 - 69460 of 83434 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669776 - 2023-06-20
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669776 - 2023-06-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with here.” With exceptions not relevant to this case, however, WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2), provides
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214127 - 2018-06-08
with here.” With exceptions not relevant to this case, however, WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2), provides
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214127 - 2018-06-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing pronouncement regarding Bilton’s ineligibility for the SAP. This case is easily distinguished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980009 - 2025-07-09
sentencing pronouncement regarding Bilton’s ineligibility for the SAP. This case is easily distinguished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980009 - 2025-07-09
State v. John R. Jagusch
inducement, the evidence was irrelevant. We therefore affirm the judgment. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11783 - 2005-03-31
inducement, the evidence was irrelevant. We therefore affirm the judgment. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11783 - 2005-03-31
Family Services of Barron County, Inc. v. Paul W.
, C.J. This is the second time this case is before us on appeal. In Family Services, Inc. v. Gary W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7297 - 2005-03-31
, C.J. This is the second time this case is before us on appeal. In Family Services, Inc. v. Gary W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rule Order
to concerns expressed by this court in recent opinions that the OLR should exercise more discretion in cases
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165845 - 2017-09-21
to concerns expressed by this court in recent opinions that the OLR should exercise more discretion in cases
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165845 - 2017-09-21
State v. David Sautier
court’s ruling on the June 1995 sentence modification motion. [2] These facts distinguish this case from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11280 - 2005-03-31
court’s ruling on the June 1995 sentence modification motion. [2] These facts distinguish this case from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11280 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the motion asserted that Erby was challenging a “frisk,” there was no frisk or pat-down in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106928 - 2017-09-21
the motion asserted that Erby was challenging a “frisk,” there was no frisk or pat-down in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106928 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is “whether the defendant has provided a DNA sample in connection with the case so as to have caused DNA
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137158 - 2017-09-21
is “whether the defendant has provided a DNA sample in connection with the case so as to have caused DNA
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137158 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circumstances of the case warranted including the money Larry received upon his mother’s death in the marital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73769 - 2014-09-15
that the circumstances of the case warranted including the money Larry received upon his mother’s death in the marital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73769 - 2014-09-15