Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6951 - 6960 of 63485 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 6951 - 6960 of 63485 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Brian C. Miller
in a psychological report prepared for child custody litigation in which the informant was involved. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14893 - 2005-03-31
in a psychological report prepared for child custody litigation in which the informant was involved. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14893 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
a reasonable person in the passenger’s position would have considered himself “in custody,” given the degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36064 - 2014-09-15
a reasonable person in the passenger’s position would have considered himself “in custody,” given the degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36064 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
suppression of Fields’ in-custody statement; and (3) sentencing. To address the sufficiency
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320655 - 2021-01-06
suppression of Fields’ in-custody statement; and (3) sentencing. To address the sufficiency
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320655 - 2021-01-06
State v. Nicholas A.G.
and that a restrictive custodial setting was necessary for his best interests and the public’s best interests. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12589 - 2005-03-31
and that a restrictive custodial setting was necessary for his best interests and the public’s best interests. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12589 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Response of Democratic Senators In Support of Petition for Original Action
. The decennial reapportionment of Wisconsin legislative districts is by law to be “accomplished by the joint
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_democratresponse.pdf - 2023-10-16
. The decennial reapportionment of Wisconsin legislative districts is by law to be “accomplished by the joint
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_democratresponse.pdf - 2023-10-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) “[D]oes [Robert] have a primary need for residential care and custody?”; (3) “[D]oes [Robert’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989236 - 2025-07-30
) “[D]oes [Robert] have a primary need for residential care and custody?”; (3) “[D]oes [Robert’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989236 - 2025-07-30
[PDF]
State v. Sherry L. Kryzaniak
. Specifically, the Kryzaniaks appeal from the trial court order denying their suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2547 - 2017-09-19
. Specifically, the Kryzaniaks appeal from the trial court order denying their suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2547 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael J. Kryzaniak
. Specifically, the Kryzaniaks appeal from the trial court order denying their suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2546 - 2005-03-31
. Specifically, the Kryzaniaks appeal from the trial court order denying their suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2546 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sherry L. Kryzaniak
. Specifically, the Kryzaniaks appeal from the trial court order denying their suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2547 - 2005-03-31
. Specifically, the Kryzaniaks appeal from the trial court order denying their suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2547 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Kryzaniak
. Specifically, the Kryzaniaks appeal from the trial court order denying their suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2546 - 2017-09-19
. Specifically, the Kryzaniaks appeal from the trial court order denying their suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2546 - 2017-09-19