Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6951 - 6960 of 43011 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Set Sudimoro Pacitan.
Search results 6951 - 6960 of 43011 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Set Sudimoro Pacitan.
[PDF]
NOTICE
was insufficiently remorseful and take that into account when setting a parole eligibility date. ¶8 Minnich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30954 - 2014-09-15
was insufficiently remorseful and take that into account when setting a parole eligibility date. ¶8 Minnich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30954 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Richard Sword v. Montgomery Ward & Company
the standard set forth in § 802.08(2), STATS., in the same manner as the circuit court. Kreinz v. NDII Secs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9517 - 2017-09-19
the standard set forth in § 802.08(2), STATS., in the same manner as the circuit court. Kreinz v. NDII Secs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9517 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 2015 WI App 6, ¶14, 359 Wis. 2d 580, 859 N.W.2d 149 (2014). A new factor is “a fact or set of facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459963 - 2021-12-09
, 2015 WI App 6, ¶14, 359 Wis. 2d 580, 859 N.W.2d 149 (2014). A new factor is “a fact or set of facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459963 - 2021-12-09
CA Blank Order
. Stat. § 805.17(2) (“[f]indings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous”). Cuesta
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93770 - 2013-03-04
. Stat. § 805.17(2) (“[f]indings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous”). Cuesta
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93770 - 2013-03-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a ‘new factor’ justifying sentence modification.”). A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017623 - 2025-10-01
of a ‘new factor’ justifying sentence modification.”). A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017623 - 2025-10-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to sexually assault women was “not an accident. This is not a set of actions taken while under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207655 - 2018-01-24
to sexually assault women was “not an accident. This is not a set of actions taken while under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207655 - 2018-01-24
City of Whitewater v. Elizabeth M. Neldner
agree that the first three reasons set forth in Quelle are also present here. We do not agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15240 - 2005-03-31
agree that the first three reasons set forth in Quelle are also present here. We do not agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15240 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the alternative exclusion regarding the application of caulk, set forth in paragraph (b), did not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95999 - 2014-09-15
that the alternative exclusion regarding the application of caulk, set forth in paragraph (b), did not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95999 - 2014-09-15
Lee J. Petrina v. James Barnard
N.W.2d 609, 613 (Ct. App. 1994). We apply the standard set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., in the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9701 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 609, 613 (Ct. App. 1994). We apply the standard set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., in the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9701 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James D.B.
to pay $50 per month in child support. Although the trial court refused to set aside the child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15914 - 2017-09-21
to pay $50 per month in child support. Although the trial court refused to set aside the child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15914 - 2017-09-21