Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6951 - 6960 of 12464 for mr.
Search results 6951 - 6960 of 12464 for mr.
State v. Randolph A. Clark
” to: “The officer asked me, ‘Mr. Clark, are you going to refuse the breath test at this time?’” Clark testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5197 - 2005-03-31
” to: “The officer asked me, ‘Mr. Clark, are you going to refuse the breath test at this time?’” Clark testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5197 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
him contact with the children. The court stated it was a “very-critical time for Mr. Roberts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546983 - 2022-07-27
him contact with the children. The court stated it was a “very-critical time for Mr. Roberts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546983 - 2022-07-27
[PDF]
State v. Mandell Ashford
addressed the trial court. She recounted how she had “been with Mr. Ashford for five years,” and that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13624 - 2017-09-21
addressed the trial court. She recounted how she had “been with Mr. Ashford for five years,” and that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13624 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Curran v. Jeannine Pemberton
objected. Curran then asked the court: MR. CURRAN: Your Honor, am I—you’re suggesting it’s—the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13170 - 2017-09-21
objected. Curran then asked the court: MR. CURRAN: Your Honor, am I—you’re suggesting it’s—the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13170 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
did not “materially deprive Mr. Olmsted of the benefit of his bargain.” Therefore, Judge Bourke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29039 - 2007-05-15
did not “materially deprive Mr. Olmsted of the benefit of his bargain.” Therefore, Judge Bourke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29039 - 2007-05-15
State v. Kris A. Westberg
to go home. It was at this point Howard decided to arrest Westberg: I told Mr. Westberg that based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7525 - 2005-03-31
to go home. It was at this point Howard decided to arrest Westberg: I told Mr. Westberg that based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7525 - 2005-03-31
Gary C. Sukowatey v. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
that “[t]he junk that Mr. Sukowatey has all over that property spills off of that property and onto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15759 - 2005-03-31
that “[t]he junk that Mr. Sukowatey has all over that property spills off of that property and onto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15759 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the claim for attorney fees…. And I wanted my client to get her money and … I was going to dismiss Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206695 - 2018-01-09
the claim for attorney fees…. And I wanted my client to get her money and … I was going to dismiss Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206695 - 2018-01-09
CA Blank Order
hearing. “[T]he committee unanimously agreed that Mr. Milanes does not appear to practice the tools
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136815 - 2015-03-10
hearing. “[T]he committee unanimously agreed that Mr. Milanes does not appear to practice the tools
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136815 - 2015-03-10
[PDF]
Paul M. J. v. Dorene A. G.
on Mr. Johnson's motion was heard, that order would probably still be in effect." These remarks do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9029 - 2017-09-19
on Mr. Johnson's motion was heard, that order would probably still be in effect." These remarks do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9029 - 2017-09-19