Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6961 - 6970 of 12473 for mr.
Search results 6961 - 6970 of 12473 for mr.
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2010AP2273-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2009CF28
then asked, “[A]nd, Mr. Soto, is it alright with you No. 2010AP2273-CR 2 that we are doing
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64279 - 2014-09-15
then asked, “[A]nd, Mr. Soto, is it alright with you No. 2010AP2273-CR 2 that we are doing
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64279 - 2014-09-15
State v. Rick A. Walz
. Anytime Mr. Walz, if I believe that he’s been drinking or have evidence that he’s drinking or has contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25623 - 2006-06-21
. Anytime Mr. Walz, if I believe that he’s been drinking or have evidence that he’s drinking or has contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25623 - 2006-06-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for this “senseless” crime, “reasonable minds could quite easily disagree with Mr. Mejia’s view.” ¶9 Mejia’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131864 - 2014-12-22
for this “senseless” crime, “reasonable minds could quite easily disagree with Mr. Mejia’s view.” ¶9 Mejia’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131864 - 2014-12-22
State v. Carl E. Vines, Sr.
portion of Vines’ sentence before inquiring, “Mr. Vines, do you admit to those convictions?” Vines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13238 - 2005-03-31
portion of Vines’ sentence before inquiring, “Mr. Vines, do you admit to those convictions?” Vines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13238 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Dear Mr. Langarica: Pursuant to your request that I obtain further information on the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165685 - 2017-09-21
Dear Mr. Langarica: Pursuant to your request that I obtain further information on the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165685 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dawn K. Larson v. Russell T. Larson
personal observation that during the trial: [I]t was very obvious that Mr. Larson was aware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6277 - 2017-09-19
personal observation that during the trial: [I]t was very obvious that Mr. Larson was aware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6277 - 2017-09-19
State v. Dave Burton
of the committing offense combined with an MR of 5/25/2001 and no indication from the parole commission as to early
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10965 - 2005-03-31
of the committing offense combined with an MR of 5/25/2001 and no indication from the parole commission as to early
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10965 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, the court acknowledged one aspect to the encounter was verbal, and that it “didn’t allow Mr. Barnhardt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110588 - 2014-04-23
, the court acknowledged one aspect to the encounter was verbal, and that it “didn’t allow Mr. Barnhardt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110588 - 2014-04-23
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
: Protection of the public. It is the primary driving objective in this sentence. Mr. Gustin, your days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974172 - 2025-06-25
: Protection of the public. It is the primary driving objective in this sentence. Mr. Gustin, your days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974172 - 2025-06-25
State v. Randolph A. Clark
” to: “The officer asked me, ‘Mr. Clark, are you going to refuse the breath test at this time?’” Clark testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5197 - 2005-03-31
” to: “The officer asked me, ‘Mr. Clark, are you going to refuse the breath test at this time?’” Clark testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5197 - 2005-03-31