Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6961 - 6970 of 64233 for records/1000.
Search results 6961 - 6970 of 64233 for records/1000.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Perry P. Lieuallen
certifying to the State Bar of Wisconsin that he was in compliance with the record keeping requirements
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16446 - 2005-03-31
certifying to the State Bar of Wisconsin that he was in compliance with the record keeping requirements
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16446 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cecil L., Jr.
decision to waive juvenile jurisdiction was “unsupported by the record” because, he contends, “no facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5866 - 2005-03-31
decision to waive juvenile jurisdiction was “unsupported by the record” because, he contends, “no facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5866 - 2005-03-31
State v. Raymond J. Rappa
based his sentence in part on evidence not in the record. We disagree and affirm the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5325 - 2005-03-31
based his sentence in part on evidence not in the record. We disagree and affirm the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5325 - 2005-03-31
Tony G. Merriweather v. Gerald Berge
is supported by the record. It appears the circuit court made factual assumptions about how and how quickly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5829 - 2005-03-31
is supported by the record. It appears the circuit court made factual assumptions about how and how quickly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5829 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence and make a record that “reflect[s] adequate consideration of and weight to each factor” in WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756758 - 2024-01-30
the evidence and make a record that “reflect[s] adequate consideration of and weight to each factor” in WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756758 - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
State v. Kevin D. Waite
and Waite's pro se sentencing arguments together. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10609 - 2017-09-20
and Waite's pro se sentencing arguments together. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10609 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) it was “unclear from the record that the defendant understood that the plea was for a consecutive jail term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251762 - 2019-12-23
) it was “unclear from the record that the defendant understood that the plea was for a consecutive jail term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251762 - 2019-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial even when she knew a bench trial was impending on April 24, 2023.” Based upon this record, R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862533 - 2024-10-16
trial even when she knew a bench trial was impending on April 24, 2023.” Based upon this record, R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862533 - 2024-10-16