Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6971 - 6980 of 83367 for case search.

State v. Timothy M. Secrist
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2476-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12944 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Timothy M. Secrist
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2476-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12944 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
to challenge the legality of his arrest; and (2) by inadequately challenging the search of his apartment. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30039 - 2007-08-20

[PDF] NOTICE
challenging the search of his apartment. We conclude that a motion challenging King’s arrest would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30039 - 2014-09-15

State v. Robert D. Moss
and thus was entitled to challenge the reasonableness of the search and seizure. We agree, and accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3436 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a search warrant and the good faith exception should not apply; and (4) the court lacked personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141760 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP1908-CR 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252876 - 2020-01-30

COURT OF APPEALS
and Schiffmann was convicted. DISCUSSION ¶5 The validity of a search and seizure is a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35620 - 2009-02-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a search or seizure violates the Fourth Amendment, 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71744 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
) (made applicable to criminal proceedings by Wis. Stat. § 972.11(1)). Whether a search or seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71744 - 2011-10-03