Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6971 - 6980 of 19130 for citi.
Search results 6971 - 6980 of 19130 for citi.
COURT OF APPEALS
(4). We disagree. A party’s identity is presumed to be public information, see Doe v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88575 - 2012-10-23
(4). We disagree. A party’s identity is presumed to be public information, see Doe v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88575 - 2012-10-23
[PDF]
Robert P. Stupar v. Township of Presque Isle
. City of Racine, 51 Wis. 526, 529-30, 8 N.W. 417, 418 (1881). This rule allows municipalities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9471 - 2017-09-19
. City of Racine, 51 Wis. 526, 529-30, 8 N.W. 417, 418 (1881). This rule allows municipalities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9471 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Knutson
for an in camera inspection. After the State failed to comply, submitting only an affidavit from a City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3163 - 2017-09-19
for an in camera inspection. After the State failed to comply, submitting only an affidavit from a City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3163 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kenny L. Warren
that the State “would have to prove that on May 26th of 2001, at 3018 North 25th Street in the City of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19322 - 2005-08-15
that the State “would have to prove that on May 26th of 2001, at 3018 North 25th Street in the City of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19322 - 2005-08-15
[PDF]
State v. William J. Gruber
had overcome the presumption of admissibility of the machine’s breath-alcohol results. See City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4332 - 2017-09-19
had overcome the presumption of admissibility of the machine’s breath-alcohol results. See City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4332 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jane M. Crawford v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
to determine the validity of a particular exclusion.” Blazekovic v. City of Milwaukee, 2000 WI 41, ¶12, 234
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3742 - 2017-09-19
to determine the validity of a particular exclusion.” Blazekovic v. City of Milwaukee, 2000 WI 41, ¶12, 234
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3742 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lori Trost v. Keith D. Trost
to a city that was a four- hour drive from Lori’s home. In January 2002, Lori moved to modify legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17594 - 2017-09-21
to a city that was a four- hour drive from Lori’s home. In January 2002, Lori moved to modify legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17594 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
.” City of Madison v. Madison Prof’l Police Officers Ass’n, 144 Wis. 2d 576, 586, 425 N.W.2d 8 (1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31685 - 2008-01-30
.” City of Madison v. Madison Prof’l Police Officers Ass’n, 144 Wis. 2d 576, 586, 425 N.W.2d 8 (1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31685 - 2008-01-30
Newport Condominium Association, Inc. v. Concord-Wisconsin, Inc.
of Seymour v. City of Eau Claire, 112 Wis.2d 313, 319, 332 N.W.2d 821, 823-24 (Ct. App. 1983
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8835 - 2005-03-31
of Seymour v. City of Eau Claire, 112 Wis.2d 313, 319, 332 N.W.2d 821, 823-24 (Ct. App. 1983
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8835 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Robert W. Burch, Jr.
that is reviewed de novo. See City of La Crosse v. Richling, 178 Wis.2d 856, 858, 505 N.W.2d 448, 449 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15419 - 2005-03-31
that is reviewed de novo. See City of La Crosse v. Richling, 178 Wis.2d 856, 858, 505 N.W.2d 448, 449 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15419 - 2005-03-31