Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6971 - 6980 of 57365 for id.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of facts unless they are clearly erroneous. Id., ¶10. The right to a speedy trial is not subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436084 - 2021-10-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties. Id., ¶40 (citation omitted). Whether a new factor exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150724 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
discretion when it provides a “rational and explainable basis” for the sentence. Id., ¶39. In order to do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28217 - 2007-02-26

Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Estate of Lavonne O. Johnson
’ intention at the time the contract was made. Id., ¶12. If the terms of the contract are plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25762 - 2006-08-29

[PDF] State v. D.L.S.
the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690. There is a strong presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6126 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is for the jury to decide. Id. at 504. No. 2011AP1960-CR 3 ¶5 We view the evidence in the light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118202 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Lukas Metnik v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
of that discretion when it bases its discretionary decision upon No. 00-2412 3 an error of law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2994 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Donald F. Sheffey
did not bring about the need for a retrial by exercising a protected right.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24910 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
that the person was operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Id., ¶15. Whether there was probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76641 - 2011-05-24

State v. Thomas M. Milligan
if there is a “reasonable probability” that the “result of the proceeding would have been different.” Id. at 320-21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2346 - 2013-10-21