Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 69751 - 69760 of 84050 for simple case search.
Search results 69751 - 69760 of 84050 for simple case search.
[PDF]
NOTICE
was put on the record: [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Your Honor, I believe we have an agreement in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36585 - 2014-09-15
was put on the record: [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Your Honor, I believe we have an agreement in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36585 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Donald Hemm, Jr.
performance. Hemm had the burden to make the case on that issue at a Machner hearing. In short, Hemm’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15769 - 2017-09-21
performance. Hemm had the burden to make the case on that issue at a Machner hearing. In short, Hemm’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15769 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
won’t say as a promise, but I took … as a promise” trial counsel’s statement that “[w]ith me on the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85491 - 2012-07-30
won’t say as a promise, but I took … as a promise” trial counsel’s statement that “[w]ith me on the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85491 - 2012-07-30
State v. Robert A. Huppeler
in imposing sentence, in this case. Furthermore, we conclude that Huppeler is not entitled to sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14235 - 2005-03-31
in imposing sentence, in this case. Furthermore, we conclude that Huppeler is not entitled to sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14235 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 766 N.W.2d 551. ¶11 Turning to the facts in this case, Deputy Sabot immediately observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92779 - 2014-09-15
, 766 N.W.2d 551. ¶11 Turning to the facts in this case, Deputy Sabot immediately observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92779 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Brenda L. Lenzner v. Timothy J. Lenzner
for Timothy’s claim was a sheet prepared by him for the hearing in this case, listing the total hours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25342 - 2017-09-21
for Timothy’s claim was a sheet prepared by him for the hearing in this case, listing the total hours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25342 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Sandy Pegues
or her ability to No. 95-1457-CR -4- determine the case impartially on the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9112 - 2017-09-19
or her ability to No. 95-1457-CR -4- determine the case impartially on the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9112 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989789 - 2025-07-30
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989789 - 2025-07-30
State v. Randy S. Ertman
does not.[4] In sum, we hold that Drexler controls this case and that Ertman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11034 - 2005-03-31
does not.[4] In sum, we hold that Drexler controls this case and that Ertman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11034 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2019AP2324-CR 7 ¶15 We conclude that under the circumstances of this case, Haizel’s inability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372580 - 2021-06-02
. No. 2019AP2324-CR 7 ¶15 We conclude that under the circumstances of this case, Haizel’s inability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372580 - 2021-06-02