Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 69761 - 69770 of 78198 for restraining order.
Search results 69761 - 69770 of 78198 for restraining order.
State v. Robert F. Karl
years, with one year in jail as a condition of probation. The court also ordered him to pay restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12279 - 2005-03-31
years, with one year in jail as a condition of probation. The court also ordered him to pay restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12279 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ellen M. Rhode v. Dennis E. Rhode
whether she would continue her education. If Ellen elected to enroll in school, the court ordered $1,300
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8658 - 2017-09-19
whether she would continue her education. If Ellen elected to enroll in school, the court ordered $1,300
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8658 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joan Schmitz
, by telephone or mail or through other individuals.” The bond order contained similar language. ¶3 One week
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16324 - 2017-09-21
, by telephone or mail or through other individuals.” The bond order contained similar language. ¶3 One week
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16324 - 2017-09-21
Jerome M. Cohen v. Vic Tanny InternationalOf Wisconsin, Inc.
the contract to order school board to appoint substitute teachers to regular teaching positions). Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8623 - 2005-03-31
the contract to order school board to appoint substitute teachers to regular teaching positions). Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8623 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel K. Nett
, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that the person acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3273 - 2005-03-31
, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that the person acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3273 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was required to order such a hearing on its own initiative once he disputed that material, but he cites
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113770 - 2017-09-21
was required to order such a hearing on its own initiative once he disputed that material, but he cites
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113770 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Glenn Van Remmen
proceeded to jury trial as a criminal case. The trial court instructed the jury that in order to find Van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12481 - 2017-09-21
proceeded to jury trial as a criminal case. The trial court instructed the jury that in order to find Van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12481 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Roy U. Schenk v. Michael Clark
as to where the lot descriptions placed the boundary line. The court therefore ordered the deeds reformed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2798 - 2017-09-19
as to where the lot descriptions placed the boundary line. The court therefore ordered the deeds reformed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2798 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gloria Mack
from the bindover order. See id. We do not address this issue further. Mack also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10946 - 2017-09-19
from the bindover order. See id. We do not address this issue further. Mack also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10946 - 2017-09-19
Virginia Camden v. Jerry Alan Camden
. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] Pursuant to our order of March 20, 2001, this case was placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3565 - 2005-03-31
. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] Pursuant to our order of March 20, 2001, this case was placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3565 - 2005-03-31