Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6981 - 6990 of 63316 for Motion for joint custody.

State v. Scott A. Defere
on Defere’s pretrial motion to suppress, a patrol officer testified that at 1:05 a.m. on June 3, 2002, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5941 - 2005-03-31

State v. Anthony Murphy
house. When the police inquired as to what was going on, one of the men motioned towards Murphy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4149 - 2011-09-25

[PDF] WI App 130
a postconviction motion seeking, among other things, eighty-six days of custody credit towards his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70096 - 2014-09-15

WI App 130 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1955-CR Complete Titl...
and the order denying his postconviction motion. Harris, who was sentenced to ten months in the house
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70096 - 2011-09-27

[PDF] WI APP 80
to the principle that the findings of fact and orders of the trial court concerning the custody of minor children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149430 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We conclude that Ellis’s motion is barred because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70281 - 2011-08-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jimmie Lee Ellis, pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70281 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Michael J. Kryzaniak
. Specifically, the Kryzaniaks appeal from the trial court order denying their suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2546 - 2017-09-19

State v. Sherry L. Kryzaniak
. Specifically, the Kryzaniaks appeal from the trial court order denying their suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2547 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael J. Kryzaniak
. Specifically, the Kryzaniaks appeal from the trial court order denying their suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2546 - 2005-03-31