Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6981 - 6990 of 16449 for commentating.
Search results 6981 - 6990 of 16449 for commentating.
COURT OF APPEALS
comments satisfy this standard. ¶6 The circuit court considered the gravity of the crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38397 - 2009-07-27
comments satisfy this standard. ¶6 The circuit court considered the gravity of the crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38397 - 2009-07-27
State v. Enrique Ayala Trujillo
is clear from the trial court's comments is that the sentence was imposed based on the severity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8755 - 2005-03-31
is clear from the trial court's comments is that the sentence was imposed based on the severity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8755 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David Burba
to the search. While it is true that the trial court did not explicitly comment on these particular facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5281 - 2017-09-19
to the search. While it is true that the trial court did not explicitly comment on these particular facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5281 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kevin L. Guibord
that the officer acted without probable cause. The trial court denied the motions without comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8889 - 2005-03-31
that the officer acted without probable cause. The trial court denied the motions without comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8889 - 2005-03-31
David G. Aul v. Charles L. Murray
hearing." Counsel's comment is unnecessarily disparaging, particularly when the record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8833 - 2005-03-31
hearing." Counsel's comment is unnecessarily disparaging, particularly when the record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8833 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Watkins
assuming they did, this is insufficient to satisfy the definition of provocation. This comment cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7642 - 2005-03-31
assuming they did, this is insufficient to satisfy the definition of provocation. This comment cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7642 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Thompson
. According to the Judicial Council Note commenting on a revision of § 973.15(2)(a), Stats., the old language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10238 - 2005-03-31
. According to the Judicial Council Note commenting on a revision of § 973.15(2)(a), Stats., the old language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10238 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
is a determination particularly within the court’s discretion. Ocanas, 70 Wis. 2d at 185. The court commented
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144923 - 2015-07-28
is a determination particularly within the court’s discretion. Ocanas, 70 Wis. 2d at 185. The court commented
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144923 - 2015-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Anthony F. Skibba, Sr.
, Janes was not the only witness to comment on it. Nos. 00-3118-CR 00-3119-CR 5 ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3281 - 2017-09-19
, Janes was not the only witness to comment on it. Nos. 00-3118-CR 00-3119-CR 5 ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3281 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
comments here today is not something that I considered to … meet the standard of being a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108146 - 2017-09-21
comments here today is not something that I considered to … meet the standard of being a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108146 - 2017-09-21