Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6981 - 6990 of 12799 for se.
Search results 6981 - 6990 of 12799 for se.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a pro se motion for a speedy trial, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 971.10 (2017-18).3 A hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684936 - 2023-08-01
a pro se motion for a speedy trial, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 971.10 (2017-18).3 A hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684936 - 2023-08-01
State v. Wilton Tye
States Constitution 28 (1937). [5] William W. Greenhalgh & Mark J. Yost, In Defense of the "Per Se" Rule
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17589 - 2005-03-31
States Constitution 28 (1937). [5] William W. Greenhalgh & Mark J. Yost, In Defense of the "Per Se" Rule
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17589 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronnie L. Ringold
On March 18, 2003, Ringold, acting pro se, filed a motion for postconviction relief. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7295 - 2005-03-31
On March 18, 2003, Ringold, acting pro se, filed a motion for postconviction relief. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7295 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
for summary judgment. Panenka filed a pro se brief and affidavit in response to the motion, again alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51715 - 2014-09-15
for summary judgment. Panenka filed a pro se brief and affidavit in response to the motion, again alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51715 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, while it is not per se illegal, may violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026784 - 2025-10-23
, while it is not per se illegal, may violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026784 - 2025-10-23
State v. Harry L. Seymer
trial. Because the trial court erred in foreclosing Seymer, then acting pro se, from fully cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17655 - 2005-05-24
trial. Because the trial court erred in foreclosing Seymer, then acting pro se, from fully cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17655 - 2005-05-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pro se from judgments convicting him after a jury trial in case Nos. 2014AP51-CR 2014AP52-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139830 - 2017-09-21
pro se from judgments convicting him after a jury trial in case Nos. 2014AP51-CR 2014AP52-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139830 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2017AP1360 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Randy Purifoy, pro se, appeals from an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241565 - 2019-06-04
). No. 2017AP1360 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Randy Purifoy, pro se, appeals from an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241565 - 2019-06-04
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Robert J. Hyndman
on behalf of his wife and viewed them as exceeding the kind of participation a pro se debtor's spouse would
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16848 - 2005-03-31
on behalf of his wife and viewed them as exceeding the kind of participation a pro se debtor's spouse would
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16848 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Linda Veerkamp, pro se, appeals a judgment requiring her to pay her former attorneys, Menn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252700 - 2020-01-22
CURIAM. Linda Veerkamp, pro se, appeals a judgment requiring her to pay her former attorneys, Menn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252700 - 2020-01-22