Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6981 - 6990 of 83431 for simple case search.
Search results 6981 - 6990 of 83431 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claims relating to the search of Sanders’s residence. During the pendency of his case, Sanders had four
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=503204 - 2022-04-06
claims relating to the search of Sanders’s residence. During the pendency of his case, Sanders had four
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=503204 - 2022-04-06
COURT OF APPEALS
that William’s search for employment in the legal profession had been “highly restrictive” both in practice area
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47434 - 2010-03-02
that William’s search for employment in the legal profession had been “highly restrictive” both in practice area
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47434 - 2010-03-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
search for employment in the legal profession had been “highly restrictive” both in practice area
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47434 - 2014-09-15
search for employment in the legal profession had been “highly restrictive” both in practice area
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47434 - 2014-09-15
State v. Roosevelt Williams
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-1821-CR Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17127 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-1821-CR Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17127 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott A. Unertl
the consent to search Unertl gave police, and whether police had probable cause to arrest Unertl based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21440 - 2006-02-15
the consent to search Unertl gave police, and whether police had probable cause to arrest Unertl based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21440 - 2006-02-15
[PDF]
State v. Russell L. Zuerner
analyzed. Specifically, Zuerner concedes that his “second search motion” in this case is “virtually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4344 - 2017-09-19
analyzed. Specifically, Zuerner concedes that his “second search motion” in this case is “virtually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4344 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Police made contact with Cole at the credit union and recovered evidence in a search of Cole’s pants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163738 - 2017-09-21
. Police made contact with Cole at the credit union and recovered evidence in a search of Cole’s pants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163738 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David J.M.
of the evidence.2 We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched. While Christensen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13881 - 2014-09-15
of the evidence.2 We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched. While Christensen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13881 - 2014-09-15
State v. David J.M.
.[2] We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
.[2] We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dwayne Williams
to suppress the fruits of the search, arguing that Montgomery lacked probable cause to believe he was carrying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11507 - 2005-03-31
to suppress the fruits of the search, arguing that Montgomery lacked probable cause to believe he was carrying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11507 - 2005-03-31