Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6991 - 7000 of 25845 for bench warrant/1000.

2008 WI APP 137
attorney withdrew the demand. Id. at 411. S.B. then had a bench trial and was committed for six months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33686 - 2007-12-03

COURT OF APPEALS
and written decision following a bench trial, the circuit court made the following findings. ΒΆ5 In 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94619 - 2013-03-27

State v. Jimmy Sloan
to possession of property seized pursuant to a search warrant or seized without a search warrant may apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9183 - 2005-03-31

City of Monroe v. Justin P. Foulker
performed without a search warrant. As Foulker concedes in his reply brief, the recent decision in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16134 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael K. Stavlo
, constituted new factors warranting sentence modification. In a letter advising that his motion was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10660 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Darin L. Fogle
pursuant to a search warrant that he contends resulted from an initial illegal police intrusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5165 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jimmy Sloan
(..continued) Any person claiming the right to possession of property seized pursuant to a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9183 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
that there were issues that warranted further consideration including: whether the rule should be limited
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190819 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
that there were issues that warranted further consideration including: whether the rule should be limited
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190819 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael K. Stavlo
, constituted new factors warranting sentence modification. In a letter advising that his motion was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10660 - 2005-03-31