Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6991 - 7000 of 64237 for records/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence and make a record that “reflect[s] adequate consideration of and weight to each factor” in WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756758 - 2024-01-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143231 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Thomas L. Gillen
]he statutory scheme and form of judgment itself … make clear that the proceedings and record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5615 - 2017-09-19

State v. Jeffrey H. Bostedt
treatment records precluded him from discovering exculpatory evidence. Bostedt does not identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14822 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
] returned to the jury room.” 2 This entry was made while the trial court was off the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209233 - 2018-03-06

[PDF] State v. Kevin D. Waite
and Waite's pro se sentencing arguments together. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10609 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we No. 2018AP2385-CR 2 conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316113 - 2020-12-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
) it was “unclear from the record that the defendant understood that the plea was for a consecutive jail term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251762 - 2019-12-23

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
counsel’s no-merit report, and we have independently reviewed the record. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94654 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31