Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 71 - 80 of 17484 for Cost.
Search results 71 - 80 of 17484 for Cost.
[PDF]
Subcommittee on court financing executive summary
throughout the state. ! Determine what costs are associated with achieving the uniform level of court
/courts/committees/docs/CourtFinancingExecutiveSummary022704.pdf - 2009-11-11
throughout the state. ! Determine what costs are associated with achieving the uniform level of court
/courts/committees/docs/CourtFinancingExecutiveSummary022704.pdf - 2009-11-11
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman
orders requiring him to pay the costs of prior disciplinary and reinstatement proceedings. ¶2 Donald
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18712 - 2005-06-23
orders requiring him to pay the costs of prior disciplinary and reinstatement proceedings. ¶2 Donald
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18712 - 2005-06-23
[PDF]
Diane S. Burns v. Melvin G. Schroepfer
frivolous claim attorney fees under § 814.025, STATS., and granted Diane Burns real estate survey costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13439 - 2017-09-21
frivolous claim attorney fees under § 814.025, STATS., and granted Diane Burns real estate survey costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13439 - 2017-09-21
John E. Pickel v. John Harr, Jr.
that awarded Donna and John Harr statutory costs.[1] He maintains that the trial court’s award was not timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11831 - 2005-03-31
that awarded Donna and John Harr statutory costs.[1] He maintains that the trial court’s award was not timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11831 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John E. Pickel v. John Harr, Jr.
statutory costs.1 He maintains that the trial court’s award was not timely, outside the strict thirty-day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11831 - 2017-09-21
statutory costs.1 He maintains that the trial court’s award was not timely, outside the strict thirty-day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11831 - 2017-09-21
Robert J. Nehm v. State of Wisconsin Department of Agriculture
for a Department cost-sharing grant. Because of this, the circuit court reversed the Department’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10939 - 2005-03-31
for a Department cost-sharing grant. Because of this, the circuit court reversed the Department’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10939 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert J. Nehm v. State of Wisconsin Department of Agriculture
Robert J. and Kathleen C. Nehm in their efforts to qualify for a Department cost-sharing grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10939 - 2017-09-20
Robert J. and Kathleen C. Nehm in their efforts to qualify for a Department cost-sharing grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10939 - 2017-09-20
2008 WI APP 75
. Those claims revolved around WEPCO’s private easement rights along a county highway and the costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32342 - 2008-05-27
. Those claims revolved around WEPCO’s private easement rights along a county highway and the costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32342 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
district’s authority under WIS. STAT. § 88.64 (2023-24)1 to assess an upstream municipality for the costs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980714 - 2025-07-09
district’s authority under WIS. STAT. § 88.64 (2023-24)1 to assess an upstream municipality for the costs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980714 - 2025-07-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
district’s authority under WIS. STAT. § 88.64 (2023-24)1 to assess an upstream municipality for the costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980714 - 2025-07-09
district’s authority under WIS. STAT. § 88.64 (2023-24)1 to assess an upstream municipality for the costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980714 - 2025-07-09