Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 71 - 80 of 17366 for Cost.

[PDF] Tammy Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.
FINE, J. Tammy Kolupar appeals a circuit-court order awarding her $3,523.46 in taxable costs under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24877 - 2017-09-21

Tammy Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.
FINE, J. Tammy Kolupar appeals a circuit-court order awarding her $3,523.46 in taxable costs under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24877 - 2006-05-30

[PDF] WI 60
reprimanded for his professional misconduct and that no costs be assessed against him. Neither Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51680 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman
, we direct that the costs of these reinstatement proceedings totaling $2243.35 be paid by Harman
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17562 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Diane S. Burns v. Melvin G. Schroepfer
frivolous claim attorney fees under § 814.025, STATS., and granted Diane Burns real estate survey costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13439 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Subcommittee on court financing executive summary
throughout the state. ! Determine what costs are associated with achieving the uniform level of court
/courts/committees/docs/CourtFinancingExecutiveSummary022704.pdf - 2009-11-11

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman
orders requiring him to pay the costs of prior disciplinary and reinstatement proceedings. ¶2 Donald
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18712 - 2005-06-23

John E. Pickel v. John Harr, Jr.
that awarded Donna and John Harr statutory costs.[1] He maintains that the trial court’s award was not timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11831 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John E. Pickel v. John Harr, Jr.
statutory costs.1 He maintains that the trial court’s award was not timely, outside the strict thirty-day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11831 - 2017-09-21

Robert J. Nehm v. State of Wisconsin Department of Agriculture
for a Department cost-sharing grant. Because of this, the circuit court reversed the Department’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10939 - 2005-03-31