Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 71 - 80 of 68274 for did.
Search results 71 - 80 of 68274 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in this matter. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001017 - 2025-08-26
court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in this matter. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001017 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
examination, Johnson testified as follows: [Prosecutor] Prior to your involvement in this case, did you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187361 - 2017-09-21
examination, Johnson testified as follows: [Prosecutor] Prior to your involvement in this case, did you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187361 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. The department’s administrative law judge (ALJ) ruled against Hewko, as did the circuit court on judicial review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103379 - 2013-10-21
. The department’s administrative law judge (ALJ) ruled against Hewko, as did the circuit court on judicial review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103379 - 2013-10-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel because his trial counsel did not object to testimony of an officer regarding the veracity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132234 - 2014-12-29
of counsel because his trial counsel did not object to testimony of an officer regarding the veracity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132234 - 2014-12-29
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Kollmann
scheduled haircut. Kollmann met them at the barbershop but did not have any money to pay for the haircut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7184 - 2017-09-20
scheduled haircut. Kollmann met them at the barbershop but did not have any money to pay for the haircut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7184 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial counsel did not object to testimony of an officer regarding the veracity of another witness’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132234 - 2017-09-21
trial counsel did not object to testimony of an officer regarding the veracity of another witness’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132234 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph J.J.
before and wanted to do it again and did they want to come along. They said no. Steven observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12581 - 2017-09-21
before and wanted to do it again and did they want to come along. They said no. Steven observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12581 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph J.J.
before and wanted to do it again and did they want to come along. They said no. Steven observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12581 - 2005-03-31
before and wanted to do it again and did they want to come along. They said no. Steven observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12581 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
modification. Because we conclude that the postconviction court did not err, we affirm. No. 2007AP1668
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32221 - 2014-09-15
modification. Because we conclude that the postconviction court did not err, we affirm. No. 2007AP1668
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32221 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that the postconviction court did not err, we affirm. ¶2 Gray pled guilty to two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32221 - 2008-03-31
conclude that the postconviction court did not err, we affirm. ¶2 Gray pled guilty to two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32221 - 2008-03-31