Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 71 - 80 of 57151 for id.
Search results 71 - 80 of 57151 for id.
[PDF]
WI APP 86
to the enforcement of a negotiated plea agreement.” Id., ¶16. As such, once a defendant pleads guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97910 - 2017-09-21
to the enforcement of a negotiated plea agreement.” Id., ¶16. As such, once a defendant pleads guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97910 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 92
intrusion that was not supported by probable cause: (1) a stop; and (2) a frisk. See id., 392 U.S. at 19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64233 - 2014-09-15
intrusion that was not supported by probable cause: (1) a stop; and (2) a frisk. See id., 392 U.S. at 19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64233 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the findings are clearly erroneous. Id. However, we review de novo the legal question of whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939082 - 2025-04-10
the findings are clearly erroneous. Id. However, we review de novo the legal question of whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939082 - 2025-04-10
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Hoeft
assertion of right; and (4) prejudice to the defendant. Id. at 530. ¶7 The first factor, length
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19759 - 2017-09-21
assertion of right; and (4) prejudice to the defendant. Id. at 530. ¶7 The first factor, length
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19759 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard A. Hoeft
assertion of right; and (4) prejudice to the defendant. Id. at 530. ¶7 The first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19759 - 2005-09-26
assertion of right; and (4) prejudice to the defendant. Id. at 530. ¶7 The first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19759 - 2005-09-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) allowing recovery would enter a field that has no sensible or just stopping point. Id., ¶27. Any one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113724 - 2017-09-21
) allowing recovery would enter a field that has no sensible or just stopping point. Id., ¶27. Any one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113724 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a field that has no sensible or just stopping point. Id., ¶27. Any one of these considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113724 - 2014-06-02
a field that has no sensible or just stopping point. Id., ¶27. Any one of these considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113724 - 2014-06-02
COURT OF APPEALS
independent of the circuit court, though benefiting from its analysis. Id. We uphold the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32064 - 2008-03-10
independent of the circuit court, though benefiting from its analysis. Id. We uphold the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32064 - 2008-03-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Id. We uphold the circuit court’s findings of historical fact unless clearly erroneous. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32064 - 2014-09-15
. Id. We uphold the circuit court’s findings of historical fact unless clearly erroneous. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32064 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
." Id. ¶11 We review de novo "[w]hether a defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92356 - 2013-03-31
." Id. ¶11 We review de novo "[w]hether a defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92356 - 2013-03-31