Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 701 - 710 of 63654 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 701 - 710 of 63654 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
’ judgment of divorce, which incorporated their marital settlement agreement, granted them joint legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98077 - 2013-06-12
’ judgment of divorce, which incorporated their marital settlement agreement, granted them joint legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98077 - 2013-06-12
COURT OF APPEALS
a motion seeking to modify custody and placement of Peter. Relative to that proceeding, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30557 - 2007-10-09
a motion seeking to modify custody and placement of Peter. Relative to that proceeding, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30557 - 2007-10-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
, David filed a motion seeking to modify custody and placement of Peter. Relative to that proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30557 - 2014-09-15
, David filed a motion seeking to modify custody and placement of Peter. Relative to that proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30557 - 2014-09-15
Patricia Lorraine Price v. Timothy Michael Price
to permit him to investigate the custody and placement issue. However, in November 1998, Patricia left
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2708 - 2005-03-31
to permit him to investigate the custody and placement issue. However, in November 1998, Patricia left
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2708 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Patricia Lorraine Price v. Timothy Michael Price
, it granted joint custody to the parties with primary physical placement of the child to Timothy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2708 - 2017-09-19
, it granted joint custody to the parties with primary physical placement of the child to Timothy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2708 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification and credit. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49877 - 2010-05-11
and from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification and credit. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49877 - 2010-05-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a child and from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification and credit. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49877 - 2014-09-15
of a child and from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification and credit. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49877 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and divorced in 2006. The court awarded the parties joint legal custody of Braden and gave Kathryn “final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76793 - 2014-09-15
and divorced in 2006. The court awarded the parties joint legal custody of Braden and gave Kathryn “final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76793 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
The parties were married in 2000 and divorced in 2006. The court awarded the parties joint legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76793 - 2012-01-18
The parties were married in 2000 and divorced in 2006. The court awarded the parties joint legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76793 - 2012-01-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a dangerous weapon. He claims the trial court should have granted his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29887 - 2014-09-15
of a dangerous weapon. He claims the trial court should have granted his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29887 - 2014-09-15